Search for: "He v. Holder"
Results 3081 - 3100
of 5,732
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 May 2024, 9:01 pm
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit in Jorge Alcarez, et al. v. [read post]
23 Dec 2016, 3:29 am
Kay v. [read post]
18 Aug 2016, 11:29 am
Kay v. [read post]
18 Sep 2010, 2:40 am
Were it otherwise, [trademark holders] could effectively monopolize descriptive terms. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 2:13 am
Holder, September 4, 2012. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 7:34 am
Google confirms Judge Baer’s decision last year in the related case Authors Guild v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 10:56 am
Or whether Eric Holder does. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 6:35 am
He blogs at The Barr Code. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 5:32 am
In a case that will be argued before the Supreme Court this coming term (Holder v. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 2:36 am
Icaza, 492 F.3d 967 (8th Cir. 2007), and United States v. [read post]
19 Aug 2009, 12:00 am
For instance, in Centrafam v Sterling case [(1976) F.S.R. 164], the real beneficiary was the parallel importer who sold the drug nalidixic acid (Negram) twice the price in England, not the final consumer or the patent holder. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 7:20 am
First, back in 2008, in the UK High Court case of Hays v Ions, Mark Ions, a former employee of recruitment company Hays, was ordered to hand over details of contacts that he had migrated from his work email address book to his personal LinkedIn account. [read post]
13 May 2008, 1:22 pm
Here it is. *** West London Man is going to Lords this Saturday to watch England v New Zealand. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 9:04 am
It is not too much to ask a professional, when he/she publishes a work online, personally or through third parties, to adopt the appropriate measures, also of a technical nature, in order to clarify his/her copyright and the will to control the circulation of his/her own work” [para 105]. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 12:40 pm
Last summer both Apple and Google's Motorola appealed Judge Posner's June 2012 dismissal of a two-way Apple v. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 8:34 am
Hartford and Macomber v. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 12:15 pm
Only one unreversed Supreme Court majority opinion has upheld a content-based speech restriction on strict scrutiny grounds — last year’s Holder v. [read post]
21 Mar 2009, 3:31 am
The motion in Parhat v. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 1:01 am
In Gonzales v. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 11:24 pm
He may or may not agree depending on context.The enforcement-related main part of Dr. [read post]
