Search for: "JEFFREY S. MAY" Results 3081 - 3100 of 7,190
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 May 2016, 12:00 pm by Suzanne Maloney
But the article’s substantive claims, particularly regarding the Obama administration’s approach to Iran, are serious enough to warrant yet another response. [read post]
8 May 2016, 7:48 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
This past Friday, I heard Jeffrey Simpson of The Globe speak in Ottawa to the 18th Biennial National Conference: New Developments in Communications Law and Policy on “Canada’s Policy Challenges and the Trudeau Government. [read post]
8 May 2016, 7:00 am
Hochberg, Sullivan & Cromwell LLP, on Sunday, May 8, 2016 Editor's Note: Jeffrey D. [read post]
7 May 2016, 8:25 am
Those readers who found Jeffrey Goldberg's picture of Obama in his March Atlantic profile refreshing for the president's willingness to insult American allies publicly will be similarly cheered here by Rhodes's boast of deceiving American citizens, lawmakers, and allies over the Iran deal. [read post]
7 May 2016, 6:33 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
If you are the victim of Massachusetts product liability, call the Law Offices of Jeffrey S. [read post]
6 May 2016, 6:21 am by Tim Sitzmann
DeShong, Case No. 14-11157 (May 3, 2016)(available here). [read post]
5 May 2016, 6:59 am by MBettman
Argument may be supplied by counsel but not the facts necessary for the court’s determination.) [read post]
4 May 2016, 10:38 am by Jeffrey P. Gale, P.A.
Giorgetti, 868 So.2d 512, 518 (Fla.2004) (“We are also obligated to construe statutes in a manner that avoids a holding that a statute may be unconstitutional. [read post]
4 May 2016, 10:38 am by Jeffrey P. Gale, P.A.
Giorgetti, 868 So.2d 512, 518 (Fla.2004) (“We are also obligated to construe statutes in a manner that avoids a holding that a statute may be unconstitutional. [read post]
3 May 2016, 7:51 am by Crystal Clark, Esq.
In a typical discrimination context, the employer’s intent is key when examining the reason given for the action and the circumstantial evidence that may call that stated reason into question. [read post]