Search for: "Kennedy v. State"
Results 3081 - 3100
of 8,224
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jul 2015, 9:51 am
In one such case, MKB Management Corp. v. [read post]
25 Jul 2015, 4:30 am
The latest episode of the UK saga “and what do we do with data retention laws” has been issued by the English High Court, with its judgement in the case David Davis and Ors v The Secretary of State for the Home Department [2015] EWHC 2092 (Admin). [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 8:41 am
As Justice Kennedy opined in Obergefell, and as the U.S. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 11:35 am
After the 5-4 "decision" last month in Obergefell v. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm
Second, in Oncale v. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 9:07 am
On November 14, 2014, in Priests for Life v. [read post]
19 Jul 2015, 6:28 pm
(for the government).United States v. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 10:15 pm
To have said so would have crossed the line between separation of church and state. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 3:16 pm
Henderson v. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 8:12 am
Hodges, holding that states must license marriages between same-sex couples, continues to spawn coverage and commentary. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm
To be sure, Obamacare subsidies in federal-exchange states were taking place before the Court affirmed their validity in King v. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 5:20 pm
Obergefell v. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 5:00 pm
No surprise after United States v. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 2:42 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 8:36 am
Kennedy) I laughed so hard when I read this quote that I almost chocked on my water. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 6:00 am
Kennedy developed his jurisprudential vision over time – from Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 10:40 am
In a sweeping and ennobling opinion by Justice Anthony Kennedy in Obergefell v. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 4:06 pm
In the process, the divergent conclusions in Johnson v Medical Defence Union [2007] EWCA Civ 262 (28 March 2007) and the earlier Irish case ofCollins v FBD Insurance plc [2013] IEHC 137 (14 March 2013) (interpreting the frankly odd section 7 of the Data Protection Act, 1988 (also here)) were rejected. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 12:41 pm
On March 12, 2014, in State v. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 5:43 am
So it does follow that such a right, although not expressly stated in our constitution, is truly fundamental; our basic human experience makes it so.The 5-4 marriage equality decision, authored by Justice Kennedy, was joined by all three female justices as well as Justice Steven Breyer. [read post]
