Search for: "LEVY V. LEVY"
Results 3081 - 3100
of 3,418
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Oct 2008, 5:21 am
See Paul Levy's post and their amicus brief. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 10:41 pm
by Paul Alan Levy I have recently had some involvement with two proceedings under the Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy ("UDRP"), a procedure for deciding trademark disputes about domain names. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 4:09 pm
Fish and Game Code v. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 11:56 pm
" The case is Kennedy v. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 4:00 am
., the Court will hear argument in Herring v. [read post]
3 Oct 2008, 3:51 pm
Levy said it is too soon to say whether Toney will be retried.The responsibility of the state to provide exculpatory evidence to the defense was articulated in the 1963 Supreme Court ruling in Brady v. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 2:18 am
McIntyre v. [read post]
30 Sep 2008, 10:11 pm
Jones Day v. [read post]
27 Sep 2008, 11:31 pm
• Winter v. [read post]
25 Sep 2008, 6:07 pm
(Washington University)Levy David M. [read post]
20 Sep 2008, 12:46 am
., Hopson v. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 8:25 pm
Morgan v. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 6:00 pm
: (Ars Technica), Google, GE join forces for green tech research, lobbying: (Ars Technica), AIPPI Congress: how to protect you IP rights in virtual worlds (Managing Intellectual Property), Industry still wary of ICANN plan for new top-level internet domains: (Intellectual Property Watch), Ubuntu-Firefox EULA dustup reignites OSS licensing debate: (Ars Technica), Media standard backers attempt Apple-less solo run: (Out-Law), Open Source in Mobile conference: OpenMoko CEO says embrace fragmentation,… [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 12:12 pm
Peck v. [read post]
17 Sep 2008, 1:58 pm
(MPEP 2112 (V), 2112.01(I))). [read post]
14 Sep 2008, 9:30 pm
Manufacturers who abuse their influence with retailers to fraudulently exclude competitors may be liable under Section 2, as in Conwood Co. v. [read post]
14 Sep 2008, 12:58 pm
In such a scenario, no capital gains could be levied. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 11:53 pm
Sure enough, the docket in that case, Jones Day v. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 12:12 pm
Available so far in just nine European languages -- none of which is English -- the Opinion of the Advocate General opinion in Case C-52/07 Kanal 5 and TV 4 v STIM makes interesting reading (unless you don't read the right languages, in which case it looks quite menacing on the page). [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 8:36 am
A similar issue has been raised in Wake County v. hotels.com, and in jurisdictions throughout the country. [read post]
