Search for: "Long v. State"
Results 3081 - 3100
of 45,671
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jan 2009, 12:17 pm
In Schuylkill Twp. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 7:58 am
In doing so, the Court overturned two long-standing Dormant Commerce Clause precedents: Quill Corp. v. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 9:51 am
Co-authored by Jeffrey Berman, Dana Peterson, and Brandon McKelvey The California Supreme Court announced today that it will issue its decision at 10:00 a.m. tomorrow in the much-anticipated meal and rest period case of Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. [read post]
16 Apr 2011, 4:52 pm
In his great 1953 concurrence in Brown v. [read post]
25 Nov 2015, 11:58 am
Gobeille v. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 12:30 pm
Dunham v. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 6:34 pm
In Gilmore v. [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 8:00 am
Marika Delgado, et al. v. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 4:51 am
Longs v. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 3:45 am
That’s the question confronting the New York Court of Appeals, the state’s highest court, in Pappas v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 6:38 am
For too long, ozone smog and particle pollution have traveled far from their sources, threatening lives and health across far away state borders. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 3:57 am
Instead, for as long as the UK continued to be internationally responsible for a geographical territory, it would only be able to shirk its duties through actions on the international law plane. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 7:30 am
In the automobile accident case of Wakole v. [read post]
14 Aug 2007, 1:24 pm
But there's a little known codicil of Title 31 that allows the United States to open up virtually anything, without any reason -- and certainly FedEx packages -- as long as they're ostensibly looking for currency violations. [read post]
16 Aug 2020, 12:22 pm
The Supreme Court’s 5–4 decision in McGirt v. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 5:57 am
” Professor Gillian Metzger Too Long, Didn’t Read After a Supreme Court term like no other, even the decision in West Virginia v. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 10:39 am
North Carolina).It is definitely worth debating these issues on the merits, especially in the unique context of the Spending Clause, where, in my view, there is a fairly strong argument that (so long as the regulation survives South Dakota v. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 10:47 pm
United States, United States v. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 3:20 am
United States v. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 6:45 am
AFSCME union case which overturned the 1977 decision, Abood v. [read post]
