Search for: "Long v. Superior Court" Results 3081 - 3100 of 3,774
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jun 2009, 6:25 am
CONTRASTS IN CLAIMS: EVALUATING EMOTIONAL DISTRESS—Part II— A “False Claim” Barbara Long, M.D., Ph.D., A.B.P.N. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 2:38 am by Russell Beck
The Superior Court of San Diego County, discussed by Daniel Salinas, a California appellate court reversed a trial court that refused to enforce a nonsolicitation agreement contained in a stipulated injunction. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 4:30 am by Nick Farr
 Anderson was the first of three similar class actions filed in the Los Angeles County Superior Court. [read post]
26 May 2009, 10:08 am
 I have written before that the Supreme Court confirmation process has become, in effect, a game. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm by admin
Jeffries Homes Housing Project, 306 Mich 638, 647-48; 11 NW2d 272 (1943); Grand Rapids Bd of Ed v Baczewski, 340 Mich 265, 270-71; 65 NW2d 810 (1954); Dep’t of Conservation v Connor, 316 Mich 565, 576-78; 25 NW2d 619 (1947). 9  See Chicago, Detroit, etc v Jacobs, 225 Mich 677; 196 NW 621 (1924); Michigan Air Line Ry v Barnes, 44 Mich 222; 6 NW 651 (1880); Toledo, etc R Co v Dunlap, 47 Mich 456; 11 NW 271 (1882); Detroit, etc R Co v. [read post]
11 Sep 2024, 1:13 pm by Giles Peaker
While on rent repayment orders, the change to make superior landlords liable for rent repayment orders, thereby overturning Rakusen v Jepsen, is carried over. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 4:45 pm
Norberg, Defamation Lawsuit, Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco (2008) [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 3:21 am
Google (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) Amazon – Smarties v Smarties: Ce De Candy sues Amazon for selling Nestles Smarties: Ce De Candy, Inc v. [read post]
21 Mar 2021, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
But not long after the decision was announced, those who had been trying to get the Court to agree to make believers above the law let loose. [read post]
9 Dec 2021, 12:00 am by Jordan Bierkos
Act, as long as they do not subtract from the prescribed definition;[9]Shelly Morris at para. 24; quoting Boomars Plumbing & Heating Ltd. v Marogna Brothers Enterprises Ltd., 1998 CanLII 2970 (BCCA). [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 4:00 am by Xavier Beauchamp-Tremblay
Before that, I did a bit of commercial litigation, mostly at the Québec Superior Court. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 8:53 am by WIMS
 Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> Sierra Club v. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 12:39 pm by Robin Frazer Clark
Judge Alex Manning is a Judicial Officer in the Family Division of the Superior Court of Fulton County. [read post]