Search for: "MAY v. US " Results 3081 - 3100 of 120,441
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Aug 2011, 3:05 pm by PaulKostro
The use of extrinsic evidence to impeach a witness’s credibility is permitted by N.J.R.E. 607, but does not specify what types of extrinsic evidence may be used. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 12:35 pm by Peter Snyder
The unanimous opinion in Atlantic Marine Construction Co. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 6:18 am by Maureen Cosgrove
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website] ruled unanimously [opinion, PDF] Wednesday in Kappos v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 1:57 pm by Paul Ohm
E.g., Smith, 442 U.S., at 742; United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 8:54 am by Dennis Crouch
Prometheus Labs (On Remand to the Federal Circuit 2010) The Federal Circuit’s first full post-Bilski decision may come in the case of Mayo v. [read post]
26 Aug 2015, 3:30 pm by Vera Ranieri
TVEyes should not be forced to become copyright cop solely because someone else may use a link in a way the court doesn’t like. [read post]
10 May 2011, 12:55 pm
  I hereby grant you five consecutive life sentences, plus five consecutive 20-year enhancements for using a gun. [read post]
26 May 2011, 11:03 am
  Or, failing that, use the forms, including but not limited to the CCP 998 form. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 1:46 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
As the courts love to tell us, "not every push or shove, even if it may later seem unnecessary in the peace of a judge's chambers, violates the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 8:17 am by Will Baude
Professor Josh Blackman has a nice new paper, The Irrepressible Myths of Cooper v. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 1:35 pm
The press is unusually interested in an employment law case the US Supreme Court released on June 29, 2009, Ricci v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 11:09 am by Jake Linford
See, for example, EMI Catalogue Partnership v. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 5:06 am by Jamison Koehler
  It did not matter that the complaining witness may have had second thoughts about being used by the state to prosecute the accused. [read post]