Search for: "May v. Summers" Results 3081 - 3100 of 4,734
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Sep 2024, 3:57 pm by Alexis Hancock
New Announcements, New Scope Digital ID has been moving fast this summer. [read post]
7 Feb 2020, 12:43 am
Note that the course application deadline is Friday 28 February 2020, and only a few places remain.Tuesday 12 May 2020, 9am-5pm: Drafting and negotiating IP terms in research contractsTuesday 19 May 2020, 9:30am-5pm: P Licensing: An advanced level drafting workshopTuesday 26 May 2020, 9am-5pm: Introduction to ContractsTuesday 9 June 2020, 9am-5pm: Drafting "legal" clauses in commercial contractsUCL IBIL - 'Privacy and Data: Law and Practice' courseUCL… [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 7:59 am by amy
 Furthermore, in a 2011 judgment on an immigration case from the Supreme Court, ZH (Tanzania) v. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 7:59 am by amy
 Furthermore, in a 2011 judgment on an immigration case from the Supreme Court, ZH (Tanzania) v. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 4:21 am by Edith Roberts
” At Legal Sports Report, Ryan Rodenberg wonders whether changing views among professional-sports-league officials may “trigger a suggestion of mootness” in Murphy v. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Favors v Cuomo, 2012 WL 928223 *2, 2012 US Dist LEXIS 36910, *10 [ED NY, Mar. 19, 2012, No. 11-CV-5632, Raggi, Lynch, and Irizarry, JJ.]; Rodriguez v Pataki, 2002 WL 1058054, *7, 2002 US Dist LEXIS, *25-27 [SD NY 2002, May 24, 2002, No. 02 Civ. 618, Walker, Ch. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Favors v Cuomo, 2012 WL 928223 *2, 2012 US Dist LEXIS 36910, *10 [ED NY, Mar. 19, 2012, No. 11-CV-5632, Raggi, Lynch, and Irizarry, JJ.]; Rodriguez v Pataki, 2002 WL 1058054, *7, 2002 US Dist LEXIS, *25-27 [SD NY 2002, May 24, 2002, No. 02 Civ. 618, Walker, Ch. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 5:50 am by Susan Brenner
The relationship began in the summer of 2006, when Anna was living with her mother and older sister in Cabarrus County. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 7:50 pm
(Maier & Maier)   US Patents – Decisions CAFC: Defendant may defeat false patent marking claim by showing no intent to deceive: Pequignot v Solo Cup Company (IP Spotlight) (Patently-O) (GRAY on Claims) (Florida IP) (Inventive Step) Two Strykes and you're out - Fed. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 5:41 pm by INFORRM
Hutcheson (formerly known as “KGM”) v News Group Newspapers, heard 24 May 2011 (Master of the Rolls, Etherton and Gross LJJ). [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 5:00 pm by Lisa McElroy
One other note:  The Court sided with the state here, which some may view as siding with gay marriage proponents. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 4:11 am by James Romoser
Sineneng-Smith, which the court decided in May. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 9:53 am by Lyle Denniston
Solicitor General for a reaction on whether the Court should grant review of four cases that had reached the Justices during the summer recess. [read post]