Search for: "Paras v. State" Results 3081 - 3100 of 6,183
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 May 2024, 10:30 pm by Michael Chatzipanagiotis
Ever since, the MC99 provisions have been an integral part of the EU legal order (C-344/04 IATA and ELFAA, para. 36), save for the provisions on cargo, for which competence rests with the EU Member States. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 1:44 pm by NL
Para 59 of Auld LJ's judgment in Cadona was quoted, to the effect that this was short term accommodation as a short term measure taken as a last resort. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 1:44 pm by NL
Para 59 of Auld LJ's judgment in Cadona was quoted, to the effect that this was short term accommodation as a short term measure taken as a last resort. [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 11:54 pm
In R(S) v Sutton, Stanley Burnton J said, at para 40: Prevention undoubtedly involves an objective test. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 12:34 pm by emagraken
The difference is then multiplied by the number of days that the trial went over (paras. 31, 39). [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 7:47 am by emagraken
Colwell, 2010 BCSC 1040, where he states: In each of the above three decisions [Spencer v. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 4:00 am by Martin Kratz
The development of this business model has troubled the Courts in the United States and the United Kingdom. [read post]
9 May 2010, 11:54 am by Omar Ha-Redeye
Dardi, J. applied the principle in Glover v. [read post]
8 May 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
Toronto (City), 2001 SCC 68 at para. 14; Hislop v. [read post]