Search for: "People v High" Results 3081 - 3100 of 15,041
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Mar 2014, 1:18 pm by CJLF Staff
 FL High Court to Hear Case Involving Juvenile Life Sentences: A Florida woman convicted of murder when she was 15-years-old and sentenced to life in prison is asking the Florida Supreme Court to be re-sentenced under the US Supreme Court's 2012 ruling in Miller v. [read post]
Thursday The Court is not sitting today, but judgment is being handed down in the joined criminal cases R v Jogee and R v Ruddock. [read post]
17 Jul 2007, 9:40 am
, the one in which Matt Fraser was punished for giving a student government speech laced with sexual double entendres (calling people "douchbags" is arguably worse); and (2) San Diego v. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 4:18 am by David DePaolo
Austin's employer was a non-subscriber.And the court also upheld the lower court's ruling in Seabright Insurance Co. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 6:17 am by Rachel, Law Clerk
Here are the leading legal headlines from Wise Law on Twitter for Monday, June 17, 2013:Lawsuit as Two Groups Rekindle Fight Over Anne Frank Legacy Man suing lawyers fights vexatious litigant ruling All Leaks Are Illegal, but Some Leaks Are More Illegal Than Others Federal judge strikes down Colorado marijuana magazine law Tennessee judge creates a stir by developing a dress code for female attorneys RCMP launch criminal probe of $90K cheque to Mike Duffy Fewer Online Marriages Result in Divorce… [read post]
8 Mar 2022, 6:15 pm
Oxycodone is a Schedule II drug, and along with other opiates, it has a high potential for addiction and abuse. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 1:15 am by Adam Wagner
Hall & Ors v Mayor of London (On Behalf of the Greater London Authority) [2010] EWCA Civ 817 (16 July 2010) – read judgment The Mayor of London has won a court order to evict a camp of protesters from Parliament Square, with the Court of Appeal upholding a decision of the High Court stating that the Mayor’s response to the protest was proportionate and not a breach of the protesters’ human rights. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
 This claim is, of course, deeply counterintuitive, and it would be very awkward, to say the least, for the Supreme Court to explain to the American people that Section 3 doesn’t apply to someone who’s been President because although that person held an “office,” it wasn’t an office “of the United States. [read post]