Search for: "People v High"
Results 3081 - 3100
of 15,041
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Nov 2020, 2:55 am
One notable consequence of high state cigarette excise tax rates has been increased smuggling as people procure discounted packs from low-tax states and sell them in high-tax states. [read post]
23 Nov 2020, 10:45 pm
Could government mandate vaccination for people who lack valid medical reasons why a generally safe and effective vaccine would pose an unacceptably high health risk for them? [read post]
23 Nov 2020, 9:01 pm
Could government mandate vaccination for people who lack valid medical reasons why a generally safe and effective vaccine would pose an unacceptably high health risk for them? [read post]
23 Nov 2020, 5:52 am
The latter can be tough to prove, though the Florida Supreme Court did find in the 1991 case of Ellis v. [read post]
22 Nov 2020, 5:43 pm
” He also interpreted the MRI images as showing: “a high signal and thickening of the peroneus brevis and longus tendons of the distal to the lateral malleolus consistent with tendinosis. [read post]
21 Nov 2020, 6:39 am
When people get married, they join their lives…at least on an ongoing basis. [read post]
19 Nov 2020, 9:29 pm
IDC case not long ago, the first anti-suit injunction in China is granted by the Supreme People’s Court’s IP Tribunal of PRC (“China SPC IP Tribunal“) in Huawei v. [read post]
19 Nov 2020, 4:30 pm
UgandaHuman Rights Network Uganda v. [read post]
19 Nov 2020, 7:25 am
ZTE and Conversant v. [read post]
19 Nov 2020, 4:11 am
But then, how did Mark V. [read post]
18 Nov 2020, 12:05 pm
People First of Alabama. [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 9:01 pm
In a more recent case, Lujan v. [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 12:30 pm
(v) conducting, on the agency’s behalf, collective bargaining negotiations under chapter 71 of title 5, United States Code. [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 12:30 pm
(v) conducting, on the agency’s behalf, collective bargaining negotiations under chapter 71 of title 5, United States Code. [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 11:23 am
Dunkins (EFF) New Federal Court Rulings Find Geofence Warrants Unconstitutional (EFF) EFF Files Amicus Brief Arguing Geofence Warrants Violate the Fourth Amendment (Ongoing case of People v Dawes in SF Superior Court re geofence warrants) People v. [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 2:44 pm
Seems like a good deal for the bond company; they'll get their $5,000 fee (ten percent) and the odds are super high that Al-Zetawi will show up for trial. [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 6:00 am
” Sanjour was also blessed with a high I.Q. [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 4:51 am
Indeed, many people were unlikely to even know about the allegations were it not for the suit. [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 4:00 am
Richard Kopf Why CLS proves that Buck v. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 9:01 pm
Many of those people are Republican state legislators, but even the legislators who are skeptical will be under the same high pressure that every other Republican is now under to deny reality.It is true that the Supreme Court would not be likely to weigh in, so long as the legal fight is over the current flurry of baseless suits from Trump’s lawyers. [read post]
