Search for: "People v. Smith"
Results 3081 - 3100
of 3,472
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jul 2009, 2:07 pm
For example, the intention behind the equal protection clause might be formulated at a relatively high level of generality--leading to the conclusion that segregation is unconstitutional--or at a very particular level--in which case the fact that the Reconstruction Congress segregated the District of Columbia schools might be thought to support the "separate but equal" principle of Plessy v. [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 4:36 pm
I also think the Jack Smith prosecution of Trump is unconstitutional. [read post]
28 Aug 2017, 6:13 pm
State v. [read post]
14 Oct 2023, 3:00 am
” Smith v. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 12:48 pm
Smith. [read post]
7 Jan 2024, 3:45 am
Here is the complaint: Babbitt v. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 8:51 am
Kelly v. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 3:27 am
To paraphrase Lord Atkin in United Australia v Barclays Bank[7], today, when the ghost of Mallet stands in the path of a just and equitable outcome, clanking its gender biased chains, the proper course for a judge is to pass through it undeterred. [read post]
5 Jul 2024, 12:42 pm
Kahn v. [read post]
Media Law Review of the Year 2011: Defamation, Contempt, Privacy and a Public Inquiry – Jude Townend
29 Dec 2011, 4:54 pm
The Kyiv Post was successful in a “libel tourism” case brought by businessman Dimitry Firtash in respect of a story downloaded by 21 people in England. [read post]
9 May 2008, 10:30 pm
: (IAM), Voting procedures set for WIPO DG vote next week: (Intellectual Property Watch), People: Change of IP guard at US, Australia missions; IFPMA readies new leader: (Intellectual Property Watch), What is intellectual property fraud? [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm
The conflict is not between princes and people, as it was in the 16th and 17th centuries, but between individual communicators and a multiplicity of laws… What is plainly required is an international agreement to govern communications on the web and, in particular, to determine whether they are to be regulated by an agreed set of supra-national regulations or, if not, to provide a generally acceptable means of deciding which domestic law should apply to any offending publication. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 9:56 am
#1 — DiCosolo v. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 5:53 am
Certainly, asking our judges to be respectful to litigants using other general neutral means (such as addressing a party as "Attorney Smith" or "Plaintiff Smith") does not force anyone to violate their beliefs. [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 8:10 am
See U.S. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 7:13 am
The latest decisions from our nation’s courts, including the Massachusetts Supreme Court “Ibanez” decision, Kemp v. [read post]
9 Jul 2011, 5:44 am
It’s called: FDIC v. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 11:58 am
This is Tom Goldstein and Justice David Souter in Georgia v. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 11:54 am
This discussion has spilled over into the jiplp weblog and its associated LinkedIn Group, where many of the readers and members respectively are either people who write abstracts or those who use them. [read post]
26 May 2015, 11:46 am
The big issue is Tracfone/bulk situation where people buy up subsidized phones and then resell them in a way Tracfone thinks is inequitable. [read post]
