Search for: "People v. Sole"
Results 3081 - 3100
of 6,179
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Nov 2019, 7:36 am
In one sense, the stakes in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 5:20 am
Hosp. v. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 4:30 am
Dixon and the Cowan v. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 11:36 am
This morning, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
24 May 2019, 11:33 am
In Bartnicki v. [read post]
11 Feb 2022, 6:30 am
Casey and Roe v. [read post]
30 May 2021, 12:09 pm
” People v. [read post]
28 May 2009, 11:26 am
The other day we - allegedly belatedly - posted about the Supreme Court's decision in Ashcroft v. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 10:50 pm
They focused in particular on the Court of Appeal case of QD (Iraq) and Another v SSHD, which followed the ECJ case of Elgafaji v Staatssecretaris van Justitie (Case C-465/07) and disapproved the construction of Article 15(c) adopted by the AIT in KH (Article 15(c) Qualification Directive) Iraq CG [2008] UKAIT 00023: 66. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 1:39 pm
That was the issue in today's ruling in People v. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 5:43 am
Brown v. [read post]
10 Aug 2022, 4:08 pm
Aldridge v. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 7:31 am
History and tradition did, and were the sole basis for the Court's conclusion. [read post]
12 Apr 2015, 11:23 am
Breitstein, v Page 5 Aaronson, 3 AD3d 588 [2d Dept. 2004]; Colicci v Ruhm, 20 AD3d 891 [4th Dept. 2005]), where there is conclusive evidence that the petitioner is not the biological father (Matter of Thomas, 287 AD2d 642 [2d Dept. 2001]), or where the father was temporarily compelled to pay excess support solely due to the court's improper application of the child support statute (People ex rel. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 6:34 am
The majority held that Article 8 was not engaged, since there was no reasonable expectation of privacy (“REP”) which was the sole, objective criterion. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 4:40 pm
The majority held that Article 8 was not engaged, since there was no reasonable expectation of privacy (“REP”) which was the sole, objective criterion. [read post]
31 May 2011, 2:41 pm
Indeed, the Court’s attempt to reinvigorate the rights of the people under the Tenth Amendment in National League of Cities v. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 8:11 am
For example, the plaintiff in Bulun Bulun v. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 9:25 am
No citizen may be arrested except by decision of a people’s court or with the sanction of a people’s procuratorate. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 12:00 am
[Selim v NYC Transit Authority, 220 AD2d 515]Terminating an employee for failing to turn in his keys when ordered. [read post]
