Search for: "ROUNDS v. STATE"
Results 3081 - 3100
of 7,623
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 May 2012, 1:37 pm
Two interesting cases have been delivered by the ECHR in the last few weeks: Mago and others v Bosnia-Herzegovina and Yordanova and others v Bulgaria. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 12:33 am
The show’s presenter stated during the broadcast that the questions had not been seen in advance by the Prime Minister or by GB News. [read post]
12 Jun 2016, 2:43 pm
Previous rounds of amicus curiae briefs already demonstrated broadbased support. [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 1:10 pm
Fletcher, Professor of Law, Michigan State University Leah Litman and Matthew L.M. [read post]
26 Feb 2023, 12:16 am
On Tuesday morning during Oral Questions in the Commons, the Secretary of State for Justice said this in reply to a supplementary question from Martin Docherty-Hughes (West Dunbartonshire, SNP): “We have made it clear that we would not rule out ever withdrawing from the ECHR in the future”. [read post]
13 Aug 2007, 10:15 am
In this Article, Rick examines the deregulatory turn taken by the Court in FEC v. [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 6:44 am
(citing Hines v. [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 1:54 am
On the same day Collins J gave judgment in the case of Dew v Mills Nanyn . [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 11:26 am
On 25 January 2023, there was a hearing in the case of Forensic Risk Ltd v Akisanya (KB-2022-004582). [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 8:24 am
All briefing in Magwood v. [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 5:19 pm
’ Staples v. [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 4:02 pm
On Sunday, Guido Fawkes released a preview of Alastair Campbell’s evidence to the Inquiry, stating that he had acquired it by “legal means”. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 8:21 am
" Sandisk Corporation v. [read post]
21 Dec 2018, 2:15 am
Applying the Federal Circuit case Gilead Sciences, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 4:13 pm
United States A jury is considering the merits of a $850 million libel claim in the case of Bouveng v Wey. [read post]
20 Jun 2007, 3:02 am
(The point, which all defenders realize already, is that the Nifong case isn't unusual because he did it, but because he got disciplined for it.)My favorite:[I]n an era of breathless, round-the-clock coverage of big criminal cases, his over-the-top remarks were often defended. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 4:48 am
State v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 2:15 pm
The plaintiffs have two main arguments, which they summarize: The Act improperly authorizes that civilians in the United States be detained indefinitely by the military, that they be tried by military commission or military court and that they may be subject to removal to other jurisdictions in violation of the Amendments V and VI of the Constitution. [read post]
20 Jan 2019, 4:05 pm
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 7:31 am
Further, many firms get no funding at all (and the paper has scant details on that).To answer these questions, at the very least I would love to see a crosstab of funding versus early round patenting to see what portion of the funding moved to the early patentees v. not. [read post]
