Search for: "SESSIONS v. STATE" Results 3081 - 3100 of 6,573
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 am by Ben
Well Marie-Andree cited that 1879 case  Feist Publications, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 6:50 am by Quinta Jurecic
Lewis was among those legal advisors disqualified by the order: “We just stopped working on anything involved with United States v. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 2:51 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The Court found that it was wrong to have referred the case to the Extra Division of the Court of Session, and this Extra Division was wrong to have stated the original 12 month suspension of right to practice could subsequently be extended. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 1:30 am by Blog Editorial
Eadie QC: yes. 15.20 Eadie QC submits that Parliament set up a legislative scheme under the 1972 Act by way that actions by the UK Government and those of other member states flow back to affect member states. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 2:11 am by Blog Editorial
Referendums in the UK are not legally binding, although Parliament may be morally bound to follow their results. 14:08: Dominic Chambers QC begins by addressing Lord Carnworth’s question from the previous session, in relation to the Youssef case, before continuing with Stage 3 of his submissions – in the absence of Parliamentary authorisation to nullify or override the statutes, the Executive will be acting unlawfully. 14:04: The afternoon session is about to… [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 2:43 pm by Ronald Mann
Tuesday morning brought us the court’s first decision from its November argument session, in State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 9:04 am by Andrew Yeh (US) and Matt Heller (US)
We previously reported that on November 22nd, Judge Amos Mazzant of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas granted a nationwide injunction precluding the Department of Labor from implementing and enforcing the regulations on November 22nd in Nevada v. [read post]
4 Dec 2016, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
On the same day the House of Lords Communications Committee will hold evidence sessions with IPSO, Hacked Off and others to discuss developments in press regulation. [read post]