Search for: "Scalia v. United States" Results 3081 - 3100 of 4,639
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jan 2011, 9:57 am by James Bickford
United States; both are scheduled for argument in February. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 11:00 am by James E. Pfander
Leading nineteenth century legal thinkers in the United States shared this view of the suspension clause. [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 8:10 am
  Following on Adam Liptak’s article earlier this week in the New York Times on Justice Scalia’s hesitance to discuss Brown v. [read post]
20 Mar 2007, 8:25 pm
Want to amaze your friends with your ability to predict the outcome of cases argued in the United States Supreme Court? [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 7:10 am
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit in United States v. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 1:25 pm by Eugene Volokh
United States (2014) largely follows the arguments in “Executing the Treaty Power”; and the works have been cited extensively by many other scholars and courts. [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 4:57 am
Some, including Justice Scalia in the 2004 case Hamdi v. [read post]
12 Nov 2008, 6:12 pm
  Usually, in church-state cases, there's a pattern. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 3:37 am by Amy Howe
” At Medium, David Leopold considers what a four-four tie in United States v. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 3:40 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which asks what standard should be used to determine what constitutes a “serious drug offense” under the Armed Career Criminal Act. [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 10:07 am by Kent Scheidegger
On Friday, the Supreme Court took the case up: United States v. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 10:55 am by Josh Blackman
The Supreme Court of the United States has descended from the disciplined legal reasoning of John Marshall and Joseph Story to the mystical aphorisms of the fortune cookie. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 11:39 am by Kiran Bhat
Finally, Monday’s grant of certiorari in United States v. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 5:33 am by Simon Lester
 The Rousso decision is consistent with the Washington court's decision in State v. [read post]