Search for: "Search Warrant (D)" Results 3081 - 3100 of 3,918
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Nov 2009, 6:20 pm
All in, the defendants are accused of stealing $600,000 of which $74,000 in cash was recovered in a search warrant along with 200 stolen credit cards in another search warrant. [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 11:21 am by Susan Brenner
I was at a conference not long ago, and a speaker was talking about how a § 2703(b) warrant isn't a 4th I'd never heard that before; I'd always tended to assume that § 2703(b)(1)(A) incorporates 4th Amendment procedure, which would mean that an agent has to get a warrant that's supported by the 4th Amendment, particularly describes the place to be searched and the things to be seized. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 3:11 am
The affidavit for the search warrant adequately showed facts connecting defendant's premises to the drug dealing to support a search warrant for the house. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 11:52 pm
You don't need a search warrant to look over a back fence. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 7:40 am
Weiss, determined that such analysis was no longer warranted because the objected-to hearsay was already before the jury. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 12:44 pm by Susan Brenner
D), in which Brinton describes the steps he took to examine computers seized during a search of defendant's residence. [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 2:40 am
Gant (discussed here) isn’t entirely warranted. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 6:24 am
" Objectively, the police acted reasonably and in reasonable reliance on the search warrant. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 5:11 am by Susan Brenner
If that's what the officer did, then the court was correct in suppressing the evidence found on the tower; what the officer should have done at that point is to go get a warrant to search for child pornography, using the child pornography he'd already found to establish probable cause for the issuance of such a warrant. [read post]
1 Nov 2009, 8:16 pm by William D. Kickham
That decision involved the constitutionality of a "no-knock" search warrant where police officers knew that a pit bull was on the premises. [read post]
1 Nov 2009, 8:16 pm
That decision involved the constitutionality of a "no-knock" search warrant where police officers knew that a pit bull was on the premises. [read post]
1 Nov 2009, 12:03 am
October 27, 2009).* Thre was sufficient nexus for a search warrant as to defendant where there was wiretap information that showed nexus between defendant and the place to be searched. [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 8:01 am
Therefore, Reski's warrantless seizure of the pipe was permitted under the plain-feel exception to the warrant requirement. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 6:19 pm
United States, 24 F.2d 665, 666-67 (9th Cir.1928) (holding that Rule 41(d), now Rule 41(f)(1)(C), does not invariably require that the copy of the warrant and receipt be served before a search takes place). [read post]