Search for: "Stanford Law Review"
Results 3081 - 3100
of 3,687
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 May 2016, 8:28 am
They retained Kathleen Sullivan, a preeminent appellate lawyer and former Dean of Stanford Law School, to argue their cause. [read post]
17 Oct 2018, 6:00 am
Bernadette Meyler is Carl and Sheila Spaeth Professor of Law and Co-Associate Dean for Curriculum at Stanford Law School. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 3:00 am
Each patient’s case must be reviewed by a panel of doctors and other staff — similar to how complex cancer cases are evaluated. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 5:00 pm
[Disclosure: Our firm works with the Stanford Supreme Court Litigation Clinic, which is representing the plaintiffs.] [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 1:44 pm
Here, Ron Tyler, professor of law and director of Stanford Law’s Criminal Defense Clinic, and Suzanne Luban, clinical supervising attorney and lecturer in law, discuss the Floyd case and offer suggestions for a way forward. [read post]
21 Apr 2022, 7:30 am
For the Balkinization symposium on Daniel Carpenter, Democracy by Petition: Popular Politics in Transformation, 1790–1870 (Harvard University Press, 2021).Daniel Carpenter[1] Is there anything like the petition of lore left in our republic? [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 12:05 pm
More details of these problems, and more importantly some possible textual solutions, have been identified in a series of posts by Daphne Keller, Director of Intermediary Liability at the Center for Internet and Society (CIS) of Stanford Law School. [read post]
26 May 2018, 6:01 am
“From a Unitary to a Unilateral Presidency,” Boston University Law Review, Vol. 88, No. 2 (2008): 523-559. [read post]
25 Oct 2015, 8:35 am
We Robot–the premier US conference on law and policy relating to Robotics that began at the University of Miami School of Law in 2012, and has since been held at Stanford and University of Washington–returns to Miami Law April 1st-2nd in 2016. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 4:10 am
Nor, apparently, does Stanford Law School, which still employs her despite her flagrant intellectual dishonesty. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 4:43 am
Kulbicki, a case on last week’s Conference at which the Court has been asked to review whether a court violates Strickland v. [read post]
8 May 2023, 4:00 am
Recently, many people were appalled when students shut down a federal appellate judge from speaking at Stanford Law School. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 7:38 am
Cornerstone Research’s and the Stanford Law School Class Action Clearinghouse’s January 31, 2017 press release can be found here. [read post]
28 Aug 2022, 12:27 pm
A couple of note are an article from Stanford Law School, Recruiting Young People to Nonprofit Boards (Jan. 10, 2022), by Aneliese Castro and Kylie Choi; and another from Candid, How to Recruit, Engage, and Retain Millennial Board Members (Oct. 3, 2018), by Erin M. [read post]
22 Jul 2018, 9:30 pm
In 2007, the American Civil Liberties Union, the Stanford Law School Immigrants’ Rights Clinic, and the law firm Sidley Austin challenged the practice of prolonged detention in two class action cases—Garcia v. [read post]
28 May 2015, 9:00 am
” At the Stanford Law Review Online, Mark Rienzi weighs in on the same-sex marriage cases and the possible conflict with religious liberties; he contends that, “[b]y emphasizing that substantive due process protects people on all sides of important questions, the Court can demonstrate that same-sex marriage and religious liberty need not conflict. [read post]
22 May 2020, 6:02 am
Wright and Kiel Sauerman, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, on Wednesday, May 20, 2020 Tags: Boards of Directors, Business judgment rule, Controlling shareholders, Delaware cases, Delaware law, Fairness review, Merger litigation, Mergers & acquisitions, Shareholder suits SeLFIES: A New Pension Bond and Currency for Retirement Posted by Robert C. [read post]
13 Jul 2014, 11:00 pm
My review of the decision indicates that BHL did not identify the particular claim(s) contained in the patents that were allegedly infringed. [read post]
23 Sep 2024, 3:13 am
Congrats on that, Ted, and welcome to the Geek in Review. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 4:25 pm
The trial court denied Brandt-Hawley’s anti-SLAPP motion, finding the Jenkinses had established a sufficient probability of prevailing, and the Court of Appeal affirmed that order upon its de novo review. [read post]
