Search for: "State v. Brown" Results 3081 - 3100 of 8,851
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Dec 2017, 3:02 am by Walter Olson
AFSCME to recognize public employees’ First Amendment rights against forced union agency fees [Shapiro, Trevor Burrus, and Aaron Barnes] More: Shapiro and Frank Garrison, National Review; Cato Podcast with Jacob Huebert and Caleb Brown; Silvester v. [read post]
4 Sep 2008, 5:52 am
Dist., 241 F.Supp.2d 111, 121 (D.N.H.2003)) (affirming, for the same reasons, the district court's rejection of a hybrid-rights claim because the free exercise claim was not conjoined with an independently viable companion claim); Brown v. [read post]
4 Sep 2008, 5:52 am
Dist., 241 F.Supp.2d 111, 121 (D.N.H.2003)) (affirming, for the same reasons, the district court's rejection of a hybrid-rights claim because the free exercise claim was not conjoined with an independently viable companion claim); Brown v. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 1:57 am
The Roberts Court declared in Brown v Chamber of Commerce last term that California could not place anti-union-busting conditions on California's own state money. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 11:44 am
Brown said that he never saw Jianniney that day, because Brown fell asleep after he came home from work.Jianniney v. [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 4:11 am
Wood, Chair of the County Democratic Committee, sued Cortland County and Thomas Brown contending that he was wrongfully removed as Democratic Election Commissioner effective December 10, 2008 and that Thomas Brown was not properly appointed to that office for a term commencing January 1, 2009 in his stead.The authority relied upon by the County Legislature for Wood from his position: The County's Code of Ethics (Local Law 2 of 2008) prohibits an individual from concurrently… [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 7:14 am
Removal and appointment of an individual to the position of Election Commissioner by a county legislatureMatter of Wood v County of Cortland, 23 Misc 3d 913The general rule is that the power to appoint implies the power to remove. [read post]
30 Apr 2011, 10:01 pm by Kali Borkoski
  In particular, the cases yet to be decided from the November sitting are: Brown v. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 8:13 am by Steve Hall
  The webpage is titled, "CDCR's December 8, 2010 Response to ACLU Public Records Act Request: ACLU v. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 1:10 pm by Kathryn Fenderson Scott
Lewis based his ruling on an analysis of the state’s no-fault law dating back to 1974, when the Florida Supreme Court in a landmark case [Lasky v. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 8:18 pm by Lawrence Solum
He then argues that principles of federalism would also have discouraged such a result, since they required the court to defer to the stated legislative purpose of the state that had passed the law. [read post]