Search for: "State v. English"
Results 3081 - 3100
of 6,457
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jul 2012, 8:18 am
See DeJames v. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 8:18 am
See DeJames v. [read post]
27 Jan 2021, 3:41 am
TULRCA also requires employers to notify the Secretary of State of the proposal, via form HR1. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 4:51 pm
NPR (Rachel Treisman) reports: Two German states have outlawed public displays of the letter "Z," which has become synonymous with support for Russia's war in Ukraine. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 12:15 pm
The recent district court decision in Minnesota, Tri-Marketing, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 6:03 pm
” The Nonhuman Rights Project, Inc., on Behalf of Tommy v. [read post]
25 Nov 2024, 6:11 am
That broad consensus is backed by longstanding Supreme Court precedent, going back to United States v. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 3:20 am
In India, a part of this area is codified in sections 68-72 of the Contract Act, 1872, and some outstanding judgments of the High Courts, particularly before and around the 1950s (see for example Damodara Mudaliar v Secretary of State for India, Nallaya Goundar v Ramaswami Goundar and Maniagaran v Maniagaran), contain valuable accounts of how, if at all, the common law principles have been modified by the Indian legislature. [read post]
6 Jul 2013, 5:04 pm
In the United Kingdom this was memorialized in the Magna Carta—and then deepened during the course of the English civil war of the 17th century (through Coke, an important figure in colonial political jurisprudence) and naturalized among the English colonial population. [read post]
17 May 2011, 4:45 pm
A two-week English course doesn’t turn a foreigner into an English-speaking American. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 4:00 am
” Eldred v. [read post]
15 May 2009, 8:07 pm
App. 3d at p. 950.); English v. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 12:08 pm
Brown v. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 9:28 pm
United States v. [read post]
27 Nov 2021, 6:26 am
Slip Op. 06460 (1st Dept.,2021) the Appellate Division held that Family Court could exercise subject matter jurisdiction in this family offense proceeding notwithstanding that the offenses occurred out of state (see Opportune N. v. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 2:08 pm
In balancing these two rights, Tugendhat J had in mind the “ultimate balancing test” as referred to by Lord Steyn Re S (A Child) [2005] 1 AC 593 (at para 17) and guidance from Lord Bingham in R v Shayler [2003] 1 AC 247 (at para 26) that interference of the ECHR right must not be stricter than necessary to achieve the state’s legitimate aim. [read post]
9 May 2011, 6:00 pm
Reid v. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 8:29 am
Smith v. [read post]
26 May 2017, 10:15 am
The Fourth Circuit’s approach in IRAP v. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 5:11 pm
Carrington (1765), an English case well known to the Founders. [read post]
