Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court"
Results 3081 - 3100
of 9,084
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Oct 2019, 7:00 pm
At the outset, the court noted that “when two cases involving the same parties and issues are filed in two federal districts, the first-to-file rule permits the second district to exercise its discretion to transfer, stay, or dismiss the second suit in the interests of efficiency and judicial economy. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 1:10 pm
" The Montana Supreme Court affirmed the lower court decision of Judge Kathy Seeley of the Lewis & Clark County District Court of the First Judicial District.The case was brought pro se by Robert Cooper against his neighbor, Rep. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 4:13 am
Bethune-Hill, an appeal by Republican legislators of a lower-court ruling that requires 11 state legislative districts to be redrawn to correct racial gerrymandering, and Smith v. [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 5:29 am
As Wikipedia explains, in the U.S. federal court system, removal jurisdiction refers to the right of a defendant to move a lawsuit filed in state court to the federal district court for the federal judicial district in which the state court sits. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 5:30 am
On appeal, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals stated the case was “an issue of first impression” despite that the United States Supreme Court provided some statutory guidance in Intel Corp. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 1:54 pm
And so we have arrived, for the first time in our national history, at a state of affairs where almost every major presidential act is immediately frozen by a federal district court. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 3:30 am
In contrast, a District Court in Georgia in Fuller v. [read post]
23 Aug 2021, 4:42 pm
City of Los Angeles etc. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 2:55 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit reversed the decision in 1977, by a 2-1 margin, with each judge writing separate opinions. [read post]
29 May 2012, 2:56 pm
The court began by noting that, because of its rulings on the first motion as to standing, the dispute over waiver of claims had now narrowed to only two section 4(f) sites (Pearl Harbor National Historic Landmark and Merchant Street Historic District). [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 9:29 pm
Franco Now, along comes the District of Columbia Court of Appeals to tackle the same issue in Franco v. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 10:10 am
Our system of "cooperative judicial federalism" presumes federal and state courts alike are competent to apply federal and state law. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 6:25 am
Monday, a federal district judge concluded that Idaho’s “ag-gag” law violated the First Amendment (Animal Legal Defense Fund v. [read post]
23 May 2017, 3:23 am
The practical effect of the Supreme Court’s decision in Heartland v Kraft Foods will be to restrict a patentee’s choice to bring cases in patentee-friendly jurisdictions where findings of infringement and damages awards are higher than in other venues, namely the Eastern District of Texas. [read post]
23 Nov 2016, 2:31 pm
The lawsuits – one filed by a coalition of twenty-one states (State of Nevada et al. v. [read post]
9 May 2017, 6:20 am
In a case on religious displays demonstrating the judicial deference that characterizes Establishment Clause challenges to federal action, the Supreme Court in Salazar v. [read post]
5 Mar 2011, 10:07 am
In this appeal from the district court's dismissal order, we conclude that, under Bennett v. [read post]
6 May 2022, 9:21 am
From Wednesday's decision of the Rhode Island Supreme Court in Benson v. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 8:47 am
[Footnote:] The first time the Florida courts used that name ["'tipsy coachman doctrine"] was in Carraway v. [read post]
21 May 2018, 3:47 pm
Miller and District of Columbia v. [read post]
