Search for: "State v. Long"
Results 3081 - 3100
of 45,603
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 May 2011, 1:00 pm
Article 4(2) expressly excludes from the reach of the political offense exception several categories of offenses, including the following: (i) a murder or willful crime against the person of a Head of State of one of the Contracting States, or a member of the Head of State’s family; (ii) an offense for which both Contracting States have the obligation pursuant to a multilateral international agreement to extradite the person sought or to submit the case to… [read post]
16 Apr 2011, 4:52 pm
In his great 1953 concurrence in Brown v. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 4:51 am
Longs v. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 3:20 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 8:00 am
Marika Delgado, et al. v. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 9:51 am
Co-authored by Jeffrey Berman, Dana Peterson, and Brandon McKelvey The California Supreme Court announced today that it will issue its decision at 10:00 a.m. tomorrow in the much-anticipated meal and rest period case of Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 5:57 am
” Professor Gillian Metzger Too Long, Didn’t Read After a Supreme Court term like no other, even the decision in West Virginia v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 7:30 am
In the automobile accident case of Wakole v. [read post]
25 Feb 2025, 1:37 pm
In United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 10:47 pm
United States, United States v. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 6:45 am
AFSCME union case which overturned the 1977 decision, Abood v. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 3:45 am
That’s the question confronting the New York Court of Appeals, the state’s highest court, in Pappas v. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 10:39 am
North Carolina).It is definitely worth debating these issues on the merits, especially in the unique context of the Spending Clause, where, in my view, there is a fairly strong argument that (so long as the regulation survives South Dakota v. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 5:30 am
Personal Jurisdiction, Copyright Infringement, Motion to DismissWashington Shoe Company v. [read post]
29 May 2015, 7:01 am
" Blue Spike, LLC v. [read post]
11 Jun 2007, 9:30 am
United States v. [read post]
16 Aug 2020, 12:22 pm
The Supreme Court’s 5–4 decision in McGirt v. [read post]
22 Feb 2014, 6:00 am
United States, by Judith V. [read post]
14 Aug 2007, 1:24 pm
But there's a little known codicil of Title 31 that allows the United States to open up virtually anything, without any reason -- and certainly FedEx packages -- as long as they're ostensibly looking for currency violations. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 3:57 am
Instead, for as long as the UK continued to be internationally responsible for a geographical territory, it would only be able to shirk its duties through actions on the international law plane. [read post]
