Search for: "State v. Masters" Results 3081 - 3100 of 3,927
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Oct 2010, 2:26 pm by Lyle Denniston
Special Master Thompson concluded that, since the Compact does not guarantee any state a set volume of water from the Yellowstone or its tributaries, a state making more efficient use of the water it draws does not violate the Compact. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 6:46 am by Amy Bray
  As a result of the pro-government condemnation process traditionally in Georgia, and in response to the United States Supreme Court’s Kelo v. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 3:31 pm
Later, if there’s any question, I can go back and see what I did on a certain day.Favorite Internet Resource: Has to be Google.com or Accurint.com (http://www.accurint.com/).Favorite Legal Software: Our firm recently switched case management software from Amicus V to Practice Master by STI (http://www.tabs3.com/). [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 7:39 am by Anna Christensen
The Court also scheduled for oral argument in due course the first exception to the first interim report of the Special Master in 137-Original, Montana v. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 5:02 am by Howard Wasserman
One noteable feature of last week's oral argument in Snyder v. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 9:47 pm by Simon Gibbs
In Ahmed v Powell [2003] EWHC 9011 (Costs), Master Hurst considered the matter in some detail: “Note 47.14.7 ‘Rights of audience on detailed assessment’ in the White Book is the note referred to by the District Judge at the hearing on 10 July 2002. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 11:51 am by admin
C.A.), Brooke J.A. stated: The question of when and in what circumstances the court may order such a sale was considered broadly by Grant J. in Cook v. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 11:30 am by JA Hodnicki
Kuminoff (Arizona State) explore Public Policy and Market Competition: How the Master Settlement Agreement Changed the Cigarette Industry. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 11:30 am by JA Hodnicki
Kuminoff (Arizona State) explore Public Policy and Market Competition: How the Master Settlement Agreement Changed the Cigarette Industry. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 12:12 pm by emagraken
Kim, 2008 BCSC 1710, Master Keighley at para. 14 states: A party seeking to have a second examination preformed by a practitioner practicing in the same speciality or discipline as a practitioner who has already examined a person faces an uphill battle: Hothi v. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 8:05 pm by INFORRM
  In all other respects Flood upheld and applied the principles set out by the House of Lords in Reynolds v The Times and Jameel v Wall Street Journal. [read post]