Search for: "State v. R. G."
Results 3081 - 3100
of 4,530
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jun 2011, 12:50 am
This was a matter which had divided the House of Lords, and consequently been left open, in R v G (Secretary of State for the Home Department intervening) [2008] UKHL 37, in which a decision to prosecute a 15 year old for sexual intercourse with a 12 year old was challenged. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 3:01 pm
In United States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 11:30 am
In Commonwealth v. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 8:00 am
During fiscal year 2010, the highest paid executive was Mark V. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 4:14 am
Activ8-3D (EPLAW) EWPCC deals with unregistered designs: Access plus inspiration need not mean copying: Albert Packaging v Nampak (Class 99) (IPKat) United States US Patent Reform Patent Reform Update: Will the House pass America Invents Act? [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 12:59 pm
R (G) v The Governors of X School, heard 11 – 12 April 2011. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 8:50 am
G. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 11:23 pm
Cependant la décision de la Cour Suprême Coffin v. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 1:30 pm
Directions: Public Transportation, take the F, G, R Trains to 4th Avenue/9th Street station in Brooklyn. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 12:54 pm
But, today, in Sykes v. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 6:02 am
Court Rules, comment on R. 1:4-8(b) (2011). [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 11:37 pm
G. v Anthony P. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 12:25 pm
Distribution v. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 12:48 pm
. - The United States Supreme Court has issued its opinion in Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University v. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 12:12 pm
Stanford v. [read post]
5 Jun 2011, 11:53 pm
” It stated that in Hardt v. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 8:04 am
In the Matter of John Dickinson v New York State Unified Court System, Office of Court Administration Pursuant to Article 78, Petitioner, John Dickinson, seeks to annul the determination of Respondent, Office of Court Administration (OCA), to terminate Petitioner. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:53 pm
Alexander R. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 8:28 am
Zimmerman, Tony G. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 3:42 am
Interestingly, P&G's participation in the settlement appears to be based on an issue that may (or may not) be decided by the Supreme Court in Wal-Mart v. [read post]
