Search for: "State v. Sample"
Results 3081 - 3100
of 4,544
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jan 2012, 2:05 am
The TTABlog focuses primarily on final decisions, but here is a sampling of recent rulings on assorted interlocutory motions.Embarcadero Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 9:46 am
EXTREME DUI REDUCED to Regular DUI – State v. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 9:33 am
DUI REDUCED to Reckless Driving – State v. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 11:22 am
V Midkiff, 467 U.S. 229, 241 (1984)). [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 11:22 am
Department of Sanitation v. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 12:47 pm
The IG also erred when it extrapolated from a very small sample of USCIS employees, 147 managers and staff, and received 256 responses to an online survey. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 4:19 am
Other than this, there are no rules relating to DNA retention at the United States federal level.Whether the DNA that is retained is held as a sample or profile may also be relevant for privacy concerns:? [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 11:00 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 5:38 am
In United States v. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 2:32 pm
Abbott Point of Care v. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 3:42 am
In Bullcoming v. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 8:12 pm
In my preview of Tuesday’s oral argument at CAAF in United States v. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 3:16 pm
United States v. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 3:04 pm
In Moeller v. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 10:34 am
Remember Bush v. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 5:28 am
United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 10:01 am
Premium Brands Operating Limited Partnership v. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 10:01 am
Premium Brands Operating Limited Partnership v. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 5:30 am
In R (on the application of Naik) v Secretary of State for the Home Department ([2011] EWCA Civ 1546) the Court of Appeal confirmed that the exclusion of an Indian Muslim public speaker from the United Kingdom after making statements which breached the Home Office’s “unacceptable behaviours policy” was lawful, and that any interference with his rights was justified. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 6:02 am
United States v. [read post]
