Search for: "Supreme Court of New Mexico" Results 3081 - 3100 of 4,052
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Mar 2024, 1:41 pm by David Kopel
A few days after the Supreme Court decided New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
2 May 2023, 3:23 am by Seán Binder
  Florida Governor Ron DeSantis signed a measure into law yesterday making it a capital crime to rape a child under 12, a law that could set up a future Supreme Court case. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 10:50 pm by Peter Tillers
Fed.R.Evid. 402 ('Relevant evidence is admissible unless any of the following provides otherwise: the United States Constitution; a federal statute; these rules; or other rules prescribed by the Supreme Court. [read post]
22 Sep 2013, 10:32 am by Jeff Gamso
  Jesse Wegman in the Times.The Supreme Court’s next term is full of big-ticket issues — from campaign finance to affirmative action to the separation of powers — but a largely overlooked death-penalty appeal the court hasn’t agreed to hear yet could clarify how broadly it views its ultimate power to stop unjust executions.Of course, talking about the Court as if it's a unified body with a single point of view is to miss the point… [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 12:49 am by Marie Louise
(Patents Post-Grant) New Mexico politicians lobby for satellite patent office (IPBiz)   US Patents – Decisions CAFC: Bosch v. [read post]
20 Dec 2009, 4:26 pm by carie
Supreme Court weighed a challenge to lethal injection. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 8:38 am by Ryan Scoville
And Woodrow Wilson dispatched John Lind as a confidential agent to Mexico in 1913. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 2:14 pm by Shahid Buttar
Senator Dennis Chavez Memorial Lecture in Law & Civil Rights at The University of New Mexico School of Law, titled “Privacy and Civil Rights in the Age of Facebook, ICE, and the NSA. [read post]
10 Aug 2014, 5:00 am
and most recently in states such as New Mexico. where the more recent “advanced practice” regulations allow limited prescription and injections as a part of the scope of chiropractic practice. [read post]
7 May 2019, 12:23 pm
Chile-The Chilean Supreme Court refused Amazon’s application for the trademark “Alexa” (here you may access the file finder since a direct link is not possible). [read post]
7 Aug 2011, 11:24 pm by Marie Louise
(Class 46) District Court of The Hague: Legal costs: Vetus v Inno Nautic (EPLAW) District Court of The Hague awards claim for ‘rest damage’: ABK Kunststoffen v Snoeks Automotive B.V (EPLAW)   New Zealand NZ High Court clears patent attorneys of negligence: The Baby Hammock Co Limited v AJ Park Law (Patentology)   Northern Ireland Ploughing a lonely furrow? [read post]
7 Aug 2011, 11:24 pm by Marie Louise
(Class 46) District Court of The Hague: Legal costs: Vetus v Inno Nautic (EPLAW) District Court of The Hague awards claim for ‘rest damage’: ABK Kunststoffen v Snoeks Automotive B.V (EPLAW)   New Zealand NZ High Court clears patent attorneys of negligence: The Baby Hammock Co Limited v AJ Park Law (Patentology)   Northern Ireland Ploughing a lonely furrow? [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 6:00 am by Doug Cornelius
[More…] Why the Supreme Court May Review the S.E.C. [read post]
8 May 2009, 2:34 pm
According to this AP story, the White House says President Barack Obama’s announcement of a Supreme Court nominee is not imminent. [read post]
15 May 2016, 4:00 am by Barry Sookman
Witterick, 2016 FC 524 https://t.co/v9FuVgzpAu copyright case -> Fast calls on Liberals to declare TPP position before Obama visit https://t.co/M3IEUaqMsU -> Mexico Banking on New Market Access Through TPP to Grow Its Economy https://t.co/eythS4uMZH -> Sony Pictures Targets Torrent Sites With Preemptive Takedowns https://t.co/1HVgroEvrB -> [read post]
8 Oct 2012, 5:34 am by Gideon
Now, a murder suspect is mounting a challenge to that abolition and their Supreme Court will decide if the ban is Constitutional. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 8:01 am by Steve Hall
  The case echoes the dispute involved in the 2008 Supreme Court decision in Medellin v. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 5:03 am by Greg Lukianoff
The biggest problem is that the blueprint definition doesn't track the Supreme Court's standard for harassment in this context — that the conduct be "so severe, pervasive, and objectively offensive... that the victim-students are effectively denied equal access to an institution's resources and opportunities. [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 12:07 pm by Goldberg Jones
If you live in Washington, Wisconsin, Idaho, California, Nevada, New Mexico, Arizona, Texas, or Louisiana, the rules of community property apply. [read post]