Search for: "T-UP v. Consumer Protection"
Results 3081 - 3100
of 4,765
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Mar 2013, 4:35 pm
CPA claim: The consumer protection act claim turned on whether this was part of a pattern or likely to recur. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 10:23 am
My first involvement in such a case was in a case called Pearson v. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 9:55 am
On remand, the court of appeals reinstated MBS’s various claims, including its general consumer protection law claim. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 9:27 am
Conte v. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 6:01 am
In its argument, Mutual Pharmaceutical is relying on the recent Supreme Court case, Pliva v Mensing where the Court held that generic drug manufacturers can’t be held responsible for failing to warn patients about a drug’s side effects. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 5:19 am
Entm't, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 8:29 am
The AG's hire counsel to help them protect their citizens in many diverse areas, including consumer protection, antitrust and utility regulation, and environmental protection. [read post]
16 Mar 2013, 4:58 pm
On reflection: Dietemann v. [read post]
16 Mar 2013, 3:24 pm
Snyder v. [read post]
16 Mar 2013, 10:58 am
USPS v. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 3:46 pm
Perfect 10 v. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 9:47 am
We aren’t going to talk about Vessel Hull Design Protection aspects. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 7:45 am
The insurance industry is largely immune from punitive damages, bad faith, and the Michigan Consumer Protection Act. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 4:00 am
The Tribunal found patent-related contraventions when NutraSweet artificially extended its patent protection by effectively compelling consumers to continue to buy its non-patented product (by giving large allowances and other incentives) [Canada (Director of Investigation & Research) v. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 8:10 am
But it isn’t just catastrophic medical care. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 12:12 am
In the Street v. [read post]
10 Mar 2013, 6:59 pm
It is true that US companies wishing to obtain data from European companies may, in effect, voluntarily subject themselves to the requirements of the Data Protection Directive by signing up for the Safe Harbor. [read post]
10 Mar 2013, 9:37 am
Winder v. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 11:50 am
True Fit Corp. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 2:20 pm
” Von Spakovsky further argues that Section 5 is not needed because “[t]here is nothing that prevents anyone, black or white, from registering and voting. [read post]
