Search for: "U.S. v. Earl*"
Results 3081 - 3100
of 22,454
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Apr 2013, 1:04 pm
(Photo credit: Wikipedia)In his 19-page Memorandum of Decision in Gordon v. [read post]
2 Jan 2022, 4:01 pm
L. of U.S. [read post]
24 Nov 2006, 2:41 pm
Lemley says that after he filed his June certiorari petition, the U.S. [read post]
11 Aug 2008, 1:00 am
Int'l, 431 U.S. 678, 688 n. 5, 97 S.Ct. 2010, 52 L.Ed.2d 675 (1977); Lawrence v. [read post]
11 Aug 2007, 12:15 am
Even if we assume that the Lanham Act takes priority over the U.S. ratification of the treaty, the prior use could void the mark under the Lanham Act (although perhaps it's too late for the ARC to make this argument).The ARC could even argue that the red cross is not trademarkable because it is very nearly the flag of Switzerland. [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 10:06 am
by Dennis Crouch Droplets, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 6:32 am
Alberto-Culver Co., 417 U.S. 506, 510-11 & n.4 (1974); see also The Bremen v. [read post]
2 May 2023, 9:08 am
Three patents are central to this case: U.S. [read post]
19 May 2018, 12:09 pm
It would have been preferable to give the Apple v. [read post]
29 May 2014, 9:48 am
The U.S. [read post]
29 May 2014, 9:48 am
The U.S. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 1:30 pm
[text via NBER]- See also two earlier related papers posted in July 2016 and August 2016.Pereira v. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 9:30 pm
Finally, Part V addresses the future of workers’ compensation in the U.S. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 4:59 am
Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005), with questions, dealing with whether sentencing judges could draw on facts not found by the jury, following from its earlier rulings in Apprendi v. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 4:23 am
Twombly, 550 U.S. 544 (2007), and Ashcroft v.Iqbal, ___ U.S. ___, 129 S. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 9:51 pm
The U.S. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 1:04 pm
During the past several turbulent weeks for the U.S. health care system, rulings in the case Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 4:03 pm
In Munoz v. [read post]
2 Jun 2023, 12:02 am
Co. v. [read post]
8 Aug 2007, 7:19 am
In Boston Scientific Scimed, Inc. v. [read post]
