Search for: "Waters v. United States" Results 3081 - 3100 of 4,953
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 May 2018, 6:54 am by Steven Cohen
Waterhouse et al – United States District Court – District of Colorado – May 3rd, 2018) involves the purchase of real property by the plaintiff from the defendant. [read post]
14 Mar 2023, 5:08 am by Lianjun Li, Donald Sham and Angus Yu
  It also amounts to a novel point of law in Hong Kong, with conflicting authorities in the United Kingdom, Australia, Netherlands, and Norway. [read post]
27 Jul 2018, 5:47 am by Wystan Ackerman
Merely because there are millions of persons with mobility disabilities in the United States and it might be fair to assume that at least 40 of them experienced the alleged access issues at the defendant’s restaurants was not enough. [read post]
20 May 2009, 7:44 am
United States NB1: I don’t  propose to use resulting information in the article but responses may influence analysis. [read post]
13 Dec 2008, 12:13 am
The United States as intervenor and amicus supports the position of the Holy See with respect to the Holy See's status as a foreign state and the constitutionality of the FSIA. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 10:55 am by Lyle Denniston
United States was the only case in which the Court granted review in a new round of orders. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 2:32 pm by Mark Walsh
This Chicago native was a bit of a fish out of water in that sleepy burg. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 11:34 am by Aurora Barnes
Johns River Water Management District, Dolan v. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 2:13 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Z o.o. and others v Jakubowski and others, heard 28th February 2023 Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks, heard 2nd March 2023 The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v United Utilites Water Ltd No 2, heard 6th March 2023 London Borough of Merton Council v Nuffield Health Ltd, heard 7th March 2023 R (on the application of Palmer) v Northern Derbyshire Magistrates Court and another, heard… [read post]
13 Jul 2008, 4:50 am
Pacific Co. v Arizona (1945) demonstrates that state laws might violate the Commerce Clause even when in-state and out-of-state commerce are treated equally. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 6:58 am by WIMS
Similarly, the United Nations stands ready to "deliver as one" in helping Member States to implement adaptation and mitigation actions on the ground, drawing on the UN's global expertise in energy, water, development and other relevant areas. [read post]
The decision joins the lone case from the Pennsylvania state court system on the issue, Palmiter v. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 10:33 am by John Elwood
Army Corps of Engineers that a parcel of land contains “waters of the United States,” making it subject to the Clean Water Act. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 4:53 pm by Patricia Salkin
… the court, in its discretion, mayallow the prevailing party, other than the United States, a reasonable attorney’s fee…. [read post]