Search for: "50 Doe Defendants" Results 3101 - 3120 of 7,316
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jan 2017, 8:51 am by Eric Goldman
Dressing up his lawfare as a sexual privacy initiative does not mask its censorious effects.Techdirt’s comments. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 11:13 pm by Marie-Andree Weiss
A side-by-side comparison of the movie posters for the ‘Autobots’ and ‘Cars’ can be found here.Released at the very end of 2016, the ruling in this case found that ‘Autobots’ does indeed infringe the copyright of Disney’s ‘Cars’. [read post]
4 Jan 2017, 11:10 am by Eric Beasley
If a plaintiff does not know that a condition exists, it is impossible for them to avoid it, and an injury or even death can result. [read post]
4 Jan 2017, 4:12 am by SHG
As if affording indigent defendants their constitutional right to counsel shouldn’t cost anything. [read post]
1 Jan 2017, 8:58 pm by David Cheifetz
S.S. (2004), 50 M.V.R. (4th) 26, 2004 BCCA 79 (CanLII) at para. 18. [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 1:23 pm by Woodruff Family Law Group
Once the parties remain separated for one year, either of the parties can file for divorce, which Parks does. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 8:33 am by Kenneth Vercammen, Esq.
Eq. at 314; see also In re Dodge, supra, 50 N.J. at 228.In determining whether the Defendant was the dominant person in the relationship there is no clear cut rule and instead the court must look to the particular circumstances of the matter. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 am by Ben
2016 - it's been another frantic copyright year - and buzz words and themes for the twelve months included 'the value gap' between the content industries and the technology giants, linking, that 'new public', fair use, 'transformative' art, and the ongoing reform of copyright laws - in Europe, and in particular reforms to the Digital Millennium Copyright Act in the USA. [read post]
23 Dec 2016, 8:33 am
Because they get to pocket 40 or 50% of what they collect for their client, they are usually eager to settle. [read post]
23 Dec 2016, 8:15 am by John Floyd
  Inequities in Criminal Sentencing   Why does a defendant in one state receive a 10-year sentence for stealing a goat while a defendant in another state receives a 5-year sentence for a violent carjacking? [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 6:04 am by Michael Geist
Indeed, when Bell appeared before the CRTC as part of this hearing, it defended the previous 5 Mbps download/1 Mbps upload target. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 4:49 am by The Law Offices of John Day, P.C.
City of Savannah, 966 S.W.2d 34 (Tenn. 1998), the Supreme Court stated: That a danger to the plaintiff was ‘open and obvious does not, ipso facto, relieve a defendant of a duty of care. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 1:03 pm
Yet this does not make the sentence unreasonable within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. [read post]