Search for: "Any and All Under-TenantsĀ " Results 3101 - 3120 of 4,957
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Aug 2013, 12:46 pm by Cicely Wilson
In regards to plaintiff’s claims under the Lanham Act, the court concluded that plaintiff failed to establish any trademark rights. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 12:05 am by Tessa Shepperson
*The guarantor cannot normally avoid liability during the fixed term of the tenancyThe guarantor's liability under the guarantee will end if the rent goes up without a new guarantee being signedA guarantor can end their liability at any time on giving two months noticeGuarantors are entitled to recover any money paid by them to the landlord, from the tenant7. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 1:35 pm by WSLL
You will also note when you look at the opinion that all of the paragraphs are numbered. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 8:08 pm by Lanigan
The corporate laws of many states, including Florida, extend corporate liability to officers and directors under certain circumstances. [read post]
28 Jul 2013, 4:02 pm
But if the house were held as tenants in common, Hugo Hanrieder’s interest would fall into his estate to be dealt with under his will, in which case the children would have an interest in the house.In May, 1998, Ingrid Hanrieder’s lawyer asked Hugo Hanrieder’s children to release any interest they might have in the house to allow it to go into Ingrid Hanrieder’s sold name. [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 4:13 pm
The plaintiff seeks a decree that she is entitled to the title of said premise as against all of the defendants and every person claiming under them. [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 12:51 am by Dave
 And, the policy is complete madness – I might feel sorry for the Home Office, which was landed with this mess after Cameron’s speech, but never have any empathy with them.On the one hand we have the current trope of “no more red tape” for landlords; on the other, we have a potential bureaucratic nightmare created by this policy which will act as an incentive to landlords to discriminate against anyone whose immigration status may give any cause for… [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 12:51 am by Dave
 And, the policy is complete madness – I might feel sorry for the Home Office, which was landed with this mess after Cameron’s speech, but never have any empathy with them.On the one hand we have the current trope of “no more red tape” for landlords; on the other, we have a potential bureaucratic nightmare created by this policy which will act as an incentive to landlords to discriminate against anyone whose immigration status may give any cause for… [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 12:29 am by Tessa Shepperson
You landlord does not have any special rights to evict you, and the rights you have under your tenancy agreement will remain the same. [read post]
17 Jul 2013, 9:00 am
Plaintiffs’ Position: Lead Paint as a Public Nuisance They are suing under a public nuisance theory, alleging the paint created “a substantial and unreasonable injury” to all individuals exposed to the paint in older homes. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 5:22 pm
While the Landlord Tenant Court will generally require that the tenant pay all past due rent in order to avoid eviction, the Landlord Tenant Court cannot compel a tenant, who is vacating the premises, to pay any money. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 11:27 am by Larry Tolchinsky
If it turns out that under Florida law, the Grantor owned zip of the real estate, then this deed conveys zip to the Grantee. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 12:21 am by Tessa Shepperson
The fact that the tenants are un contactable rather suggests that they may be failing to pay at all. 2. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 9:37 am by S
The requirement to serve a notice on the non-participating tenants at its flat was directory rather than mandatory; as such unless Avon could show that a non-participating tenant had suffered any prejudice resulting from the method of service used Regent Court’s claim notice remained valid. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 9:37 am by S
The requirement to serve a notice on the non-participating tenants at its flat was directory rather than mandatory; as such unless Avon could show that a non-participating tenant had suffered any prejudice resulting from the method of service used Regent Court’s claim notice remained valid. [read post]
13 Jul 2013, 1:41 am by Tessa Shepperson
If you had an AST For the benefit of any assured shorthold tenants reading this, note that your situation is a bit different as an AST landlord always has the right to serve a section 21 notice on a tenant and end the tenancy. [read post]
Ann. 42-4-206 was expansive and reached any type of non-probate survivorship interest). [read post]