Search for: "Attorney General v. Superior Court"
Results 3101 - 3120
of 3,267
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Feb 2008, 1:18 pm
County of San Bernardino, San Bernardino County Superior Court (filed Apr. 13, 2007)In April California Attorney General Jerry Brown filed suit challenging the adequacy of the EIR for San Bernardino County’s General Plan. [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 9:00 am
: (IP ThinkTank),Michael Geist: presentation on open access, focusing on why adopting open access models can help counter restrictive contractual terms and copyright laws: (Michael Geist),Audacity – Sometimes sheer audacity can overcome superior forces, or a well-entrenched position: (IP ThinkTank),Presentation on IPR and professional opportunities for advocates and chartered accountants: (Generic Pharmaceuticals &… [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 12:00 am
Supreme Court, reinstated the entire $75.9 million punitive damages award that the Court had overturned nearly one year earlier in Philip Morris USA v. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 7:33 pm
The doctrine on this is a bit complicated, but I think it is fair to say that the four leading Supreme Court cases --- Raley v. [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 8:40 pm
Arnstein v. [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 11:20 am
King Billable Hour v. [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 6:00 am
Superior Court, 109 Cal.App.4th 285 (2003)). [read post]
3 Feb 2008, 1:58 pm
The case went before a Los Angeles Superior Court jury consisting of 5 men (one African-American) and 7 women. [read post]
1 Feb 2008, 9:43 am
City of Banning, Case No. 460950 (Riverside County Superior Court, January 29, 2008)). [read post]
24 Jan 2008, 3:23 am
Indiana courts overturned the conviction, and the Indiana attorney general's office asked the high court to take up the case.The case is Indiana v. [read post]
23 Jan 2008, 4:19 pm
" Indiana follows the general rule that each party must pay his or her own attorney fees. * * * Because Indiana Code Section 36-7-4-1010 does not contain a provision regarding the payment of attorney fees, it cannot be read to authorize such. [read post]
23 Jan 2008, 12:40 pm
While they are not strictly related to the UCL, they do sound very interesting, especially the second one, which addresses attorneys' fees under the private attorney general doctrine of Code of Civil Procedure section 1021.5: ROSS (GARY) v. [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 2:34 pm
Ross: I don’t really see anything that falls into this category generally. [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 12:40 pm
On January 15, 2008, the Court of Appeal in Puerto v. [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 8:48 am
Jensen v. [read post]
16 Jan 2008, 4:00 am
Experts are generally, but not always necessary in legal malpractice cases. [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 12:04 pm
Attorney General Steve Carter said he was relieved that the high court didn't allow her to escape through a loophole. [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 12:15 am
Gordon and Tracy V. [read post]
9 Jan 2008, 11:29 am
See United States v. [read post]
8 Jan 2008, 4:51 am
Superior Court [read post]
