Search for: "Beare v. State"
Results 3101 - 3120
of 15,034
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Oct 2015, 4:38 am
The first case Rosie looked at in detail was John Kaldor v Lee Ann Fashions (mentioned in the NIPC blog here), in which Kaldor found in M&S's Per Una collection, a dress (illustrated, below left) bearing a pattern of a kind which he had disclosed to Lee Ann under a non-disclosure agreement (illustrated, above, left). [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 4:00 am
The applicant for accidental disability retirement bears the burden of establishing that the disability arose from an accident within the meaning of the Retirement and Social Security Law; 2. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 9:05 pm
Batiste v. [read post]
12 Aug 2023, 4:37 am
Tous (Représentation d'un ours) (T-591/21) assessing whether the shape of a teddy bear is registerable for jewellery. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 4:00 am
The applicant for accidental disability retirement bears the burden of establishing that the disability arose from an accident within the meaning of the Retirement and Social Security Law; 2. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 4:09 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2014, 11:36 am
In the 2000 case of Bradley v. [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 6:55 am
Adkins v. [read post]
14 May 2010, 9:17 am
In Thomas Lindstrom Co., Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2007, 9:00 am
Corp. v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 7:36 am
The Court also dismissed Robertson v. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 7:43 am
The Court cited Article 249 EC which states that ‘a decision shall be binding in its entirety upon those to whom it is addressed’ and the case of AssiDomän Kraft Products AB v Commission of the European Communities [1999] ECR I-5363 (Case C-310/97). [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 7:19 pm
This was certainly the stated view of Mrs Stocker after court. [read post]
22 May 2014, 4:00 am
Blankenship v. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 10:00 pm
Ltd. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2007, 10:33 am
State of Indiana (NFP) [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 10:50 am
LLC v. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 4:20 am
The court notes that the defendant bears the burden of demonstrating the need to seal the record, citing as the basis for that the 10th District’s decision in State v. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 5:40 pm
Catalina v. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 8:35 am
The 9th agrees that in Heller, the Supremes held that the right to bear arms is a personal right, rather than a collective or State right. [read post]
