Search for: "Branch v. State"
Results 3101 - 3120
of 8,122
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Dec 2010, 7:56 am
When the case is heard next year, the states and other plaintiffs will press the Court to keep the courthouse doors open until and unless the executive branch actually protects the American people by setting Clean Air Act standards that curb the emissions of existing plants. [read post]
Second Circuit Affirms Official Acts Immunity for Pakistani ISI Chiefs; Rejects Jus Cogens Exception
29 Aug 2014, 11:28 am
”) The Second Circuit panel rejected the plaintiffs’ arguments that courts are not required to defer to Executive branch SoIs and that there is, or should be, a jus cogens exception to official acts immunity, holding that it was bound by the Circuit’s prior decision in Matar v. [read post]
5 Feb 2012, 2:54 pm
He explains his view by stating: Our founders intended for them to be the least consequential of the three branches of government . . . [read post]
5 Feb 2012, 2:54 pm
He explains his view by stating: Our founders intended for them to be the least consequential of the three branches of government . . . [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 2:05 pm
Eldridge… Building on Hamdi v. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 9:11 am
The executive branch has won three of those four (Cuozzo, Oil States and Thryv), and in the only one it lost (SAS), the court required the agency to review even more challenges to issued patents than the executive branch had wanted. [read post]
2 Jan 2007, 2:33 pm
" United States v. [read post]
18 Sep 2024, 9:28 am
Circuit published an interesting standing opinion last week: Citizens for Constitutional Integrity v. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 6:30 am
" NYCLA's Amicus Brief in Larabee v. [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 2:25 am
Since posting this update, we understand that there have been further developments in several EU27 Member States as to the temporary transitional measures that are available, and we have updated our summary table to reflect these developments. [read post]
28 May 2019, 4:42 am
One Owner v New York State Div. of Hous. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 9:44 am
The panel held that the defendants did not satisfy the five Bauman factors required for a writ of mandamus, Bauman v. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 1:49 pm
” Halkin v. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 4:02 am
Kliger-Weiss Infosystems, Inc. v Ruskin Moscou Faltischek, P.C. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 8:49 pm
United States). [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 7:50 am
The term “power of judicial review” was not used in Marbury v. [read post]
20 May 2007, 9:57 am
The President is being treated as a defacto "supreme court" within the Executive Branch, who has the last word. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 9:40 am
See Gill v. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 4:44 pm
In Sauer v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 9:45 am
Witness last week's California Supreme Court decision, Salas v. [read post]
