Search for: "Compli, Inc." Results 3101 - 3120 of 11,551
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Mar 2019, 4:40 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Employers concerned about managing their overtime liability should review and provide prompt feedback to the U.S. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 8:46 am by Joy Waltemath
The complaint asks the court to order the defendants to comply with the OSH Act’s anti-retaliation provisions and pay the employee back wages, interest, and compensatory and punitive damages. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 8:00 pm by DONALD SCARINCI
It also dismissed the complaint against the state appellees after concluding that, under United Jewish Organizations of Williamsburgh, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 5:08 am by Kevin
” In order to comply with the DMCA takedown notice, Sacks noted, “Kickstarter had no choice but to take down my project to digitally erase the rat from the end of The Departed. [read post]
1 Mar 2019, 4:04 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Group, Inc., 138 AD3d 906, 908; Regency Club at Wallkill, LLC v Appel Design Group, P.A., 112 AD3d at 607). [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 5:53 pm by Joe Mullin
In its lawsuits, Veripath claims that basic warnings about cookies on websites, a now-common method of complying with the GDPR, violate its patent. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 12:31 pm by Phillips & Associates
Sirva, Inc., 291 F.Supp.3d 245 (E.D.N.Y. 2018), but the ruling offers a useful overview of how such a claim might work. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 3:06 am
RGF Environmental Group, Inc., Opposition No. 91232746 [Opposition to registration of UPCO-QR for "Air purification units" in view of the registered mark APCO for the same goods].Read comments and post your comment here.TTABlog note: Any predictions? [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 10:24 am by Arthur F. Coon
The First District’s new published lead opinion (by Presiding Justice Pollak) continues to “distinguish” the Fourth District’s conflicting published appellate decisions in Royalty Carpet Mills, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 3:10 pm by Richard Burt
The plaintiffs argued that the written consent Abed executed failed to comply with § 228 because it did not adequately describe the actions taken. [read post]