Search for: "DEFENDER SECURITY COMPANY" Results 3101 - 3120 of 17,831
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Mar 2014, 2:53 pm by Mark Astarita
They also sent investor money to a rough diamond jewel merchant in Hong Kong and another unrelated company affiliated with Xu.SEC’s complaint alleges that WCM, WCM777, and Xu violated Sections 5(a), 5(c), and 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and Rule 10b-5. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 3:00 am by Ted Folkman
The defendants were OJSC Financial Corporation URALSIB, a Russian holding company, and several of its subsidiaries (for simplicity’s sake, I am going to refer to the defendants collectively as “URALSIB”). [read post]
7 Mar 2019, 8:12 pm
International law recognizes that States have the inherent right20 to override legal obligations to defend ‘national security’ or ‘essential security interests’.21 However, States can creatively allege simulated, artificial, or, at best, doubtful national security directives. [read post]
4 May 2012, 9:59 am
Of course, the trucker and trucking company responsible for securing the load properly are the ones legally at fault for this kind of accident, and negligent driving can also play a part. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
The insurance company Defendant pointed to a sign down form which indicated that the Plaintiff’s decedent had elected uninsured/underinsured coverage of $15,000.00. [read post]
23 May 2018, 12:00 pm by Aaron Jue
In 2016, CREDO revealed that EFF had been representing the company in a long legal battle over the constitutionality of national security letters (NSLs). [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 5:57 am by David Navetta
The reality then (as now) is that companies suffer security breaches each and every day. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 1:28 pm by Kevin LaCroix
In September 2019, a plaintiff shareholder filed a securities class action lawsuit against the company and certain of its directors and officers alleging misrepresentations in connection with the company’s June 2019 share listing. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 12:34 pm by David Cosgrove
For example, in this case, the Plaintiffs alleged that the Defendants from Advanced Equities, Inc. stated to the Plaintiffs that they were “significantly involved” for several months with the company whose shares they were promoting and yet the initial PPM issued by the Defendants omitted the fact that the company founder had a felony conviction for embezzlement. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 2:15 pm by Peter S. Lubin and Vincent L. DiTommaso
In August 2014 ProPublica and The Center for Investigative Reporting (CIR), both nonprofit news organizations, published a story about the security breach. [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 9:49 am
Judge Boggs would have upheld the trial court's grant of summary judgment to the building defendants. [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 2:00 pm by jeffreynewmanadmin
Former CFO and Audit Committee Chair also Charged The Securities and Exchange Commission has filed charges against Paul D. [read post]
  Under former Chairman Simons, the FTC also prioritized strengthening data security orders in an effort to improve companies’ data security practices and increase deterrence. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 1:15 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The primary insurer on the Tail Program accepted coverage for the securities claims and derivative claims against the former directors and officers of Social Capital but denied coverage for the securities litigation and the derivative litigation with respect to the individual defendants in the lawsuits who were directors of Legacy Clover but who were not directors of Social Capital prior to the merger. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 1:41 pm by Jim Meyers
The action itself charges Marc Sherman and Edward Cummings, CEO and former CFO, respectively, of QSGI Inc., a Florida-based computer equipment company, with violation of the antifraud and other provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. [read post]
3 May 2016, 10:28 am by Mark Astarita
”The SEC’s complaint charges all defendants with violations of Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 as well as other various violations of the federal securities laws. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 10:00 am by Jack Goldsmith, Robert D. Williams
Prosecutors went out of their way to emphasize that the defendants acted “for the purpose of commercial advantage and private financial gain. [read post]
25 Jan 2019, 7:01 am by Peter D. Hardy and Marjorie J. Peerce
”  The Washington Department of Financial Institutions has posted its guidance on virtual currency regulation, which states that the transmission of virtual currencies could make a company subject to Washington’s money transmission regulations, regardless of whether the company deals in fiat currency. [read post]