Search for: "Does, 1-25"
Results 3101 - 3120
of 18,561
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Oct 2023, 1:23 am
Does the EPC confer jurisdiction on the EPO to determine whether a party validly claims to be a successor in title as referred to in Article 87(1)(b) EPC? [read post]
10 Jan 2023, 2:39 pm
When has the PTO broken the law, and what rights does that give you? [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 4:00 am
Sekhon 2014 SCC 15[1] On January 25, 2005, the appellant, Ajitpal Singh Sekhon, was charged with unlawfully importing cocaine and unlawfully possessing cocaine for the purpose of trafficking. [read post]
26 Mar 2021, 10:51 am
I have previously shared an early drafts of the preface (here), and chapters 2 (here; June 2019), 9 (here; August 2019); 12 (here; August 2019); 20 (here; November 2019); and 25 (here; May 2020). [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 5:01 pm
At least three of the above-mentioned decisions (see point [7]) finding that R 25(1) EPC 1973 (R 36(1)) does not set a time limit but a condition, namely J 10/01, J 24/03 and J 18/04, were issued well before the notification of the examination report dated 19 July 2006. [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 9:08 pm
Azure Networks, at *25. [read post]
6 Jul 2014, 6:51 pm
NOTES[1] See e.g. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 10:22 am
Feb. 25, 2013) (“Calisi I”). [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 6:00 am
A grant of Family Unity benefits does not qualify as such an admission. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 9:10 am
The need to keep a certain sign free for competitors is not an interest protected under Art. 7(1)(b) EUTMR, but rather of other absolute grounds, such as Artt. 7(1)(c), (d) or (e) EUTMR. [read post]
3 Sep 2024, 6:00 am
"Footnotes:[1] Alternatively, petitioner demonstrated his actual knowledge of the March and September 2023 comments at meetings of the board on March 27, 2023 and September 25, 2023, respectively. [read post]
3 Sep 2024, 6:00 am
"Footnotes:[1] Alternatively, petitioner demonstrated his actual knowledge of the March and September 2023 comments at meetings of the board on March 27, 2023 and September 25, 2023, respectively. [read post]
6 May 2024, 9:55 pm
(‘VDS’) filed a request for a declaration of invalidity based on lack of individual character of M&T’s registered Community design (‘RCD’) (Artt. 25(1)(b), 6 Community Design Regulation, ‘CDR’). [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 9:50 am
Readers interested in that case may wish to know that the decision was upheld on appeal (see here), and that there was a further decision, principally about costs (see here).Returning to the silverised wound dressings case, infringement turned on the question of what is meant by "1" in the context of a claimed range of 1 to 25%. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 11:07 am
Without qualifications such as “if an employer chooses to follow the Table 1 safe harbor they may be required to... [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 5:00 am
The information is general in nature and does not constitute legal advice or any contractual obligations. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 12:21 am
Since the board does not intend to refuse the application according to the appellant's request, oral proceedings are not necessary. [read post]
10 Oct 2019, 12:32 am
Canada’s First Reverse Class Action Copyright Case | Guest Post: UK IPO Annual IP crime and enforcement report for 2018-2019 | There is No Such Thing as a Free Launch - CJEU Does Not Follow AG on Compensation for Wrongful PI | New CJEU referral on right of communication to the public... this time on seeding and de minimis threshold | [Guest Post] IP Education Series #1 | AIPPI Congress Report 4: Copyright in AI generated works | AG Pitruzzella advises CJEU to rule that… [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 5:00 am
The information is general in nature and does not constitute legal advice or any contractual obligations. [read post]
21 Apr 2021, 9:58 am
On both a federal and a state level, imposing a VMT tax does require lawmakers to make some hard decisions on trade-offs. [read post]
