Search for: "Does 1 - 23" Results 3101 - 3120 of 15,481
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 May 2024, 11:58 am by John Elwood
ShareThe Relist Watch column examines cert petitions that the Supreme Court has “relisted” for its upcoming conference. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 11:47 am by Stephen Bilkis
Page 1 2009 NY Slip Op 51445(U) THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK v. [read post]
8 Oct 2012, 1:22 pm by Yukiko Kojima
  “Major Projects” means Federal-aid projects with estimated total costs of $500 million or more and other projects as may be identified by the Secretary (see 23 U.S.C. 106(h)(1)). [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 5:03 pm by INFORRM
However, this interpretation does not appear to be consistent with the purpose of the third sentence of Article 10(1). [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 4:51 pm by Eric Schweibenz
’s September 23, 2010 Initial Determination (“ID”) in Certain Printing and Imaging Devices and Components Thereof (Inv. [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 7:35 am by Ekaterina Pannebakker
In the first part of the guidelines, the Supreme Court explains which disputes have an international character (at [1]). [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 8:36 am by Barbara S. Mishkin
  For example, the report shows that consumers complaining about mortgages disputed 23% of company responses while customers complaining about prepaid cards disputed 14% of company responses. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 6:05 am
Update [2008-1-30 9:23:41 by Big Tent Democrat]: The first big effect is that Thurday night's debate will be one on one. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 6:00 am by Beth Bernstein
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. [read post]
20 Aug 2022, 11:47 am
Wei Yin, Southwest University of Political Science and Law (online) Panel 3 Legal Culture and History of Law in China and Europe (1) 1. [read post]
18 May 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Luxembourg International Extradition Treaty with the United States October 1, 1996, Date-Signed February 1, 2002, Date-In-Force Status: July 8, 1997. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 2:09 pm by NL
The question of priority searches does not arise on this view. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 2:09 pm by NL
The question of priority searches does not arise on this view. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 6:30 pm by Kevin LaCroix
However, in a June 23, 2015 decision in In re Harman International Industries Securities Litigation (here), the D.C. [read post]