Search for: "Does 1 through 5" Results 3101 - 3120 of 24,643
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2009, 11:47 am
The grounds: that "the proposed Order (1) purports to grant the Court jurisdiction it does not have, and (2) unfairly and improperly prejudices [defendants]. [read post]
23 Aug 2013, 11:55 am by Don Cruse
The Texas Supreme Court has consolidated both cases for oral argument on November 5, 2013. [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 2:31 pm by Matthew Kahn
  But our system is being overwhelmed by migration through our southern border. [read post]
21 May 2017, 1:15 pm
Our goal is a coalition of nations who share the aim of stamping out extremism and providing our children a hopeful future that does honor to God.3 things there that will recur throughout the speech: 1. [read post]
19 May 2009, 10:35 am
Verify - You can actually verify estimated traffic through two independent web sites. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 4:43 pm by Adam Wagner
Sign up to free human rights updates by email, Facebook, Twitter or RSS Read more Lords clash over prisoner voting and European meddling Does Nick Clegg want prisoners to vote? [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 4:26 am by Russell Knight
“A [voluntary] dismissal does not dismiss a pending counterclaim” 735 ILCS 5/2-1009 Without a Counter-Petition For Dissolution of Marriage on file, you’ll have to file a brand new Petition For Dissolution Of Marriage, be assigned a new divorce judge, serve the opposing party and go through the entire divorce process again. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 8:02 am by Verena von Bomhard
The GC, referring to the earlier judgments Darjeeling (T‑627/13) and HENLEY (T‑362/15), held that “the application of [art. 8(5) EUTMR] necessarily requires a definitive conclusion as to the existence of such a reputation, which, in principle, excludes that an analysis regarding the possible application of this provision is made on the basis of a vague hypothesis, that is to say, of a hypothesis that does not rely on the admission of a popularity of a specific… [read post]
17 May 2010, 5:09 am by Broc Romanek
Compare the SEC's Rule 262(a)(3), imposing a 5-year look-back, and Rule 262(b)(1), imposing a 10-year look-back, on the convictions specified in those provisions [read post]
12 Jun 2007, 2:03 pm
Two Bills moving through the North Carolina General Assembly will, if enacted, have a significant impact on the way state construction projects are administered in the State of North Carolina. [read post]