Search for: "Does 1-37"
Results 3101 - 3120
of 5,286
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Oct 2011, 1:32 pm
However:i) It does not at all follow that in subsequent cases the decision (to entertain an appeal when the correct course was to apply by way of CPR 39.3) would be the same (as Lord Neuberger MR observed in Pereira, at [37], in the passage already cited). [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 8:49 am
Employee John Doe works for Acme and accrues 100 hours of paid sick leave. [read post]
1 May 2019, 11:32 am
Cir. 2016) (“We need not address this argument regarding whether the first prong of 37 C.F.R. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 12:21 am
As stated by Rix LJ at para 37 of DS (India): “The public interest in deportation of those who commit serious crime does well beyond depriving the offender in question from the chance to re-offend in this country; it extends to deterring and prevent serious crime generally and to upholding public abhorrence of such offending. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 5:25 am
For example, a party seeking a stay pending reexamination may agree to stipulate to utilizing 37 C.F.R. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 5:25 am
For example, a party seeking a stay pending reexamination may agree to stipulate to utilizing 37 C.F.R. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 8:57 am
Columbia Human Rights Law Review, Vol. 37(2):287-389 (2006)). [read post]
21 May 2007, 7:20 am
This will lead to a sudden emptying of some apartments (and probably some properties), particularly as Farmers Branch is 37% Hispanic. [read post]
24 Jul 2021, 11:51 am
The mere coincidence in time does not make the two wounds a single harm, or the conduct of the two defendants one tort. [read post]
27 Jul 2024, 6:53 pm
In a prior post the two foundational principles (UNGP Principles 1 and 2) were examined (see here). [read post]
9 May 2022, 7:29 am
If the prohibition of reprisals is violated, the whistleblower has a claim for damages against the perpetrator (Section 37 HinSchG-E). [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 11:11 am
Never too late 35 [week ending Sunday 1 March] – EPO v SUEPO | Supreme Petfoods Ltd v Henry Bell & Co (Grantham) Ltd | UK IPO on EPO | Scents and copyright | GIs under scrutiny | UPC test-drive | Is UK failing to protect innovation? [read post]
2 May 2021, 1:14 pm
(…) The Court does not overturn or modify its earlier cases involving fair use. [read post]
5 May 2013, 7:23 am
In paragraph 1 it proposes a distinction between NPEs and PAEs that I hadn't seen before -- these terms are synonyms. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 2:02 pm
And, by the way, in the aftermath of Brexit, 37% of millennials supported Texas secession. [read post]
17 Oct 2014, 11:38 am
Id. at **35-37. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 2:00 pm
Books Read (in order)1. [read post]
19 May 2016, 6:37 am
" What does a trade mark actually do - exclude or use? [read post]
14 Jan 2022, 9:06 am
Note that the purpose of this lecture series is to introduce readers to the subject and therefore, this lecture does not critically examines the Award insofar as the FET standard is concerned but would only provide a descriptive comment.Lecture 19: Introduction to Full Protection and Security StandardThis lecture introduces the full protection and security standard. [read post]
15 Jan 2017, 7:00 am
Insurgent and terrorist groups, particularly those with uncompromising ambitions like ISIS, may pose a greater threat to actors in the Interest Groups spectrum than does the state. [read post]
