Search for: "Does 1-54"
Results 3101 - 3120
of 3,421
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Aug 2009, 1:24 am
Borough of RoselandTAXATION - Property Taxes"No 'interests of justice' would be served by dismissing plaintiff's complaint for failure to pay the property taxes under N.J.S.A. 54:51A-1(b) when the overriding purpose of the statute has been satisfied, given the intent of the 1999 amendment to remove any 'jurisdictional prerequisite.' "
Cruz-Diaz v. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 9:16 am
Conn, 297 F.3d 548, 553-54 (7th Cir. 2002). [read post]
2 Aug 2009, 6:56 pm
" What does this sentence mean? [read post]
31 Jul 2009, 6:30 am
To be fair, he did revise his figures later, and from then on always cited a much more reasonable figure of $54 million. [read post]
28 Jul 2009, 5:36 pm
Shortly afterwards, Johnson sold almost $1 million in stock (Details here). [read post]
28 Jul 2009, 3:00 am
Serv. 2d 54 (N.Y. [read post]
23 Jul 2009, 8:00 am
Eisner would have received only 45% of the votes in favor of re-election, and a majority of the votes cast, 54%, would have been withheld from him. [read post]
23 Jul 2009, 4:21 am
Super. 47, 54 (App. [read post]
18 Jul 2009, 7:15 am
Ct. 298, 54 L. [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 6:46 pm
This song is on page 1 of the publication. 3. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 7:18 pm
§ 521 (a)(1)(A) & (B)(i),(ii),(iii). [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 12:26 pm
Slough defended on two grounds: (1) justification, that is that Mrs Clift was a violent person etc; and (2) qualified privilege. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 9:28 pm
Slip op. at 54. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 12:23 pm
” Gayet, supra, 92 N.J. at 153-54; see also Pugh v. [read post]
9 Jul 2009, 4:36 am
If the municipality does not have a chief of police, "law enforcement agency having jurisdiction" means the sheriff of the county where the municipality is located. [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 4:00 am
Magee, 54 AD3d 14 (1st Dept 2008) (read here) and Arfa v. [read post]
5 Jul 2009, 5:01 pm
Does Gonzales v. [read post]
24 Jun 2009, 8:39 am
Super. at 54. [read post]
24 Jun 2009, 3:09 am
"In Council 82, v State of New York, 255 A.D.2d 54, aff'd. 94 NY2d at 329, New York courts held that a Department's rule does not trump an employee's First Amendment rights. [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 2:02 am
The issue on appeal was whether the asserted claims were fully enabled as required by 35 U.S.C. 112 ¶ 1. [read post]
