Search for: "European Patent Office" Results 3101 - 3120 of 4,481
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 May 2011, 3:31 pm
Meanwhile, work will continue on proposals relating to the creation of a unified and specialised patent court for the classical European patents and the future European patents with unitary effect. [read post]
28 Dec 2007, 1:00 am
: (Patent Lens),Patent reform for innovation and risk: A separation of powers approach: (Patent Lens),A patent grab for power: (Patent Lens),Freely sharing innovation is the only way to face the future: (Patent Lens),Top 5 freedom to operate tips: (IPThinkTank)PharmaPatent reform: just found on pharma's radar??? [read post]
3 Sep 2018, 2:57 am by Jelle Hoekstra
For detailed explanations on these issues, see G 1/90, OJ EPO, 1991, 275, Reasons 6 and 7, and G 2/90, OJ EPO 1992, 10, Reasons 3.3.2.2 During substantive examination of an opposition, that is, once the opposition has been deemed admissible and the grounds for opposition have been examined, the opposition division, pursuant to Article 101(1), second sentence, EPC, invites the parties, as often as necessary, to file observations within a given time limit (generally four months, see Guidelines for… [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 10:33 am by Kevin Kaufman
The Netherlands did not have a CFC regime until it was made mandatory by the European Commission Anti-Tax Avoidance Directive (ATAD). [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 8:57 am
From the IPKat's friend Professor Martin Kretschmer comes news that Alison Brimelow CBE, former President of the European Patent Office and UK IP Office head, will give a CIPPM lecture on Thursday, 22 March on the struggle for a unitary patent right in Europe. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 12:22 am
No-one liked the look of it and, to mix a metaphor, this hippogriff withered on the vine of European harmonisation.Ambivalence towards the nimbus is not confined to the European Union and its constituent parts. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 4:53 am
The Respondent brought opposition proceedings in the Opposition Division of the European Patent Office (“the EPO”), following which the Patent was revoked. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 4:59 am by Marie Louise
Highlights this week included: European Court of Justice trashes planned unified patent litigation system : Avis 1/09 (Kluwer Patent Blog) (IAM) (ipeg) (BLOG@IP::JUR) (inovia’s Foreign Filing Blog) (Kluwer Patent Blog) (IP Spotlight) (PatLit) (IPKat) (PatLit) (EPLAW) Senate passes S. 23 (95-5) (Patent Docs) (IPBiz) (IP Whiteboard) (Patent Docs) (Inventive Step) (IP Spotlight) (Blawg IT) (Patents Post-Grant) (Patent Law… [read post]
31 Mar 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
“Official language” designates a language of an office, whether the patent office (A 14(1)) or the offices of a Contracting State (A 14(4)). [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 5:27 am
It sounds relaxing, indeed.* Patentability: a perpetual problem Jeremy reports on Peter Crowley v United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office, an extempore Patent Court, England and Wales, ruling in which Mr Justice Mann addressed the patentability of an invention consisting of a machine supposed to produce a surplus of energy to that which was needed in order to operate it. [read post]
13 Jan 2019, 11:30 pm by Guido Paola
The applicant (appellant) appealed against the decision of the Examining Division refusing European patent application No. 01128655.6, filed on 30 November 2001 and published as EP 1 211 613 A2. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 8:09 am
Events supported by the IPKat are  RED.Here's a real treat for connoisseurs of (i) design law and (ii) patent office propaganda -- a delightful video from the Japanese Patent Office ("Design Rights: the more you know, the more you want to learn"). [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 9:39 am
The review presents the results of a search of available patent publications from 73 national patent offices, four regional patent offices, and WIPO contained within the European Patent Office esp@cenet worldwide database between 1990 and 2003 using a working definition of biotechnology developed by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 11:28 am
Newsflash: The EPO plans to increase fleas from 1 April 2014; panic has beset the IPKat office. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 3:38 am
SOLO IP's Barbara Cookson breaks the monotony of having nothing much to blog about by reviewing what looks like a genuinely useful book on proceedings before the European Patent Office while, on Scrivener's Error, C.E. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 5:22 am
Darren Smyth, a former guest Kat and a bit of an enthusiast for patents, design rights and interesting shirts, is rejoining the IPKat team -- this time as a full-timer. [read post]
5 May 2015, 1:39 am
By contrast, the various attempts at patent harmonisation have not had the same success due to disagreements as to the scope and method of harmonisation. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 1:40 am
The manufacturer will have to inform the relevant patent office and the SPC owner about his intended activities 3 months before they begin making the product for export (Article 2(b)). [read post]
25 Oct 2016, 10:45 pm
– Specsavers nears approval to trade mark single word “should’ve” & “shouldve” | A song of Ice and Ice | ChIPs Global Summit Report 3: Congratulations – your patent has been allowed, when is it finally final? [read post]
22 Mar 2020, 12:23 pm by Thorsten Bausch (Hoffmann Eitle)
By now, the decision by the Federal Constitutional Court (FCC) voiding the German law approving the ratification of the UPC Agreement has gone viral in the patent world, though fortunately not pandemic. [read post]