Search for: "F. v. F." Results 3101 - 3120 of 57,900
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
If you just blithely ignore it, and publish the story despite having been told that it may well be mistaken, that would be textbook "reckless disregard," which would allow liability even in a public official case: Consider, for instance, Harte-Hanks Communications, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
This summary must include (i) the person or persons affected; (ii) the date the incident was discovered and whether it is ongoing; (iii) whether any data was stolen, altered, accessed or used for any unauthorized purpose; (iv) the effect of the incident on the entity’s operations; and (v) whether the incident has been remediated or is currently being remediated. [read post]
28 Mar 2023, 2:19 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Texas,867 F.3d 604 (5th Cir. 2017), as well as third-party standing, June Medical Services LLC v. [read post]