Search for: "Frank v. State"
Results 3101 - 3120
of 4,737
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Apr 2012, 9:15 pm
Frank Hernandez (open seat)Teretha Thomas Lundy (I) v. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 9:30 am
The United States relies heavily on the Supreme Court’s 1942 decision, Hines v. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 5:00 am
SEC v. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 4:56 am
United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 9:45 am
Ferrer, United States Attorney for the Southern District of Florida; and John V. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 10:09 am
[Post by Venkat Balasubramani, with comments from Eric] Mendenhall v. [read post]
14 Apr 2012, 11:13 am
ISDA and SIFMA v. [read post]
14 Apr 2012, 9:24 am
In Morrison v. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 11:49 am
He further ordered the prosecutors to review those memoranda and promptly turn over to the defense any material under Brady v. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 4:12 am
Dodd-Frank: SEC Releases Study on Cross-Border Private Securities Litigation On Wednesday, the SEC issued its 106-page study of cross-border private securities litigation as required by Section 929Y of Dodd-Frank. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 1:08 am
Supreme Court’s decision in the Morrison v. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 4:15 pm
Supreme Court’s Morrison v. [read post]
8 Apr 2012, 10:00 pm
The United States District Court for the District of Columbia denied a preliminary injunction in Safari Club International v. [read post]
7 Apr 2012, 6:10 am
Dealers Assoc. v. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 11:34 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 5:11 am
Co. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 12:34 pm
Everybody who goes public would be subject to the full panoply of regulations within 5 years or sooner if they grow fasterFor example, the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act defers compliance with two Dodd-Frank Act corporate governance provisions: an advisory shareholder vote on executive compensation and the disclosure of the median compensation of all employees compared to the CEO. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 7:44 am
V. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 7:42 am
Monday’s decision in Florence v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 7:15 am
Is the answer to Question 1 affected by the fact that the Member State has not implemented the Data Storage Directive despite the fact that the period prescribed for implementation has expired? [read post]
