Search for: "IN THE INTEREST OF: A. C., A CHILD" Results 3101 - 3120 of 4,774
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Aug 2012, 8:15 am
You could make them sell it to you, to be bought back, with interest, over time. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 12:20 pm by Sandi Sherr
  You will agree upon how and when to introduce your child/ren to new romantic interests. 7. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 2:00 am by Hull and Hull LLP
  Section 31 states: Except when a contrary intention appears by the will, where a devise or bequest is made to a child, grandchild, brother or sister of the testator who dies before the testator, either before or after the testator makes his or her will, and leaves a spouse or issue surviving the testator, the devise or bequest does not lapse but takes effect as if it had been made directly to the persons among whom and in the shares in which the estate of that person would have been… [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 10:18 am by Eugene Volokh
(C) The court could in some situations opt in favor of making the decision that leaves the child with maximum choices as an adult. [read post]
4 Aug 2012, 6:50 am by Joel R. Brandes
See Children Act 1989, c. 41, Part II, s 8(1) ("In this Act-'a contact order' means an order requiring the person with whom a child lives, or is to live, to allow the child to visit or stay with the person named in the order, or for that person and the child otherwise to have contact with each other.... [read post]
4 Aug 2012, 5:19 am by David Hart QC
Simply to follow the task set him by section 1 of the Children Act 1989, and to decide what was in the best interests of the child – which is not necessarily the same as what either parent wanted for the child. [read post]
4 Aug 2012, 5:19 am by David Hart QC
Simply to follow the task set him by section 1 of the Children Act 1989, and to decide what was in the best interests of the child – which is not necessarily the same as what either parent wanted for the child. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 1:45 pm
The other employees you are referring to in regards to divorce, child custody issues, those are personal in nature. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 11:46 am by Eilionoir Flynn
This idea too was dismissed, and the understanding put forward by the FRC on this issue was that the term ‘best interests of the child’ used in Article 7 would be interpreted in accordance with existing US law. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 11:46 am by Eilionoir Flynn
This idea too was dismissed, and the understanding put forward by the FRC on this issue was that the term ‘best interests of the child’ used in Article 7 would be interpreted in accordance with existing US law. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 11:46 am by Eilionoir Flynn
This idea too was dismissed, and the understanding put forward by the FRC on this issue was that the term ‘best interests of the child’ used in Article 7 would be interpreted in accordance with existing US law. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
 In In the Matter of C a Child, (Romford Co., May 11, 2012), the court refused to prohibit the father from presenting the child for baptism. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 3:37 pm by Justine Gottshall
” Revision of “Operator” Proposed Revision:  Personal information is collected or maintained on behalf of an operator where it is collected in the interest of, as a representative of, or for the benefit of, the operator. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 10:44 am by Bexis
  That’s particularly interesting because of the application in Sorrell v. [read post]