Search for: "In Re Opinions of the Justices" Results 3101 - 3120 of 12,647
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Aug 2009, 8:51 pm
Justice Kennedy’s opinion for the majority misunderstands both medical practice and public health principles, and, as Justice Ginsburg noted in dissent, won’t actually save the life of a single fetus. [read post]
22 May 2018, 6:18 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Indeed, a theme of Justice Gorsuch's opinion is that statutes should be read in harmony with each other, if possible. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 7:46 pm
Opinion below (11th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner’s reply Other petitions from earlier editions of Petitions to Watch were re-listed for the November 6 conference: Wong v. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 4:47 am by Guest Author
So Justice Gorsuch’s statutory interpretations aren’t just his opinion, they’re right, because the meaning of statutes, at least their best and fairest reading, is objectively determinable, using a finite set of agreed-upon interpretive tools, at least when the judicial priesthood and their retinue of scribes is doing the interpretation. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 4:47 am by Guest Author
So Justice Gorsuch’s statutory interpretations aren’t just his opinion, they’re right, because the meaning of statutes, at least their best and fairest reading, is objectively determinable, using a finite set of agreed-upon interpretive tools, at least when the judicial priesthood and their retinue of scribes is doing the interpretation. [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 8:33 am by AWoog
I think the economic perspective is a big one, finding out, you know, what we're doing wrong if we spend so much money on criminal justice and we have such bad recidivism. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 8:04 am by MBettman
These blog cases are still out: In re: (C.C.S.), (C.L.S.) v. [read post]
7 Mar 2009, 5:05 am
The opinion notes that Texas Government Code § 25.0255 also vests some authority in the presiding judge but does not explicitly state which judge should make a reassignment. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 9:01 am by Joseph Fishkin
The remarkable thing is how close the majority opinion, by Justice Alito, itself comes to revealing that this decision’s purpose and effect are essentially about economic and political power. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 4:05 am by Amy Howe
Briefly: At Re’s Judicata, Richard Re discusses the process by which the Court announces its opinions – a process, he suggests, that “help[s] to define the Court’s distinctive institutional role. [read post]
23 May 2016, 7:46 am by MBettman
In an earlier opinion the appeals court said five, and the Supreme Court of Ohio said five in State v. [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 11:30 am
” Those musings, and similar ones in the joint opinion of Justices John Paul Stevens and Ruth Bader Ginsburg, obviously prompted Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas to write their own opinion to dispute the point. [read post]
6 Feb 2008, 7:41 pm
Click here and here for Justice Margaret Marshall’s opinions, here for a Boston Globe story, and here for a National Law Journal story. [read post]