Search for: "In re April B." Results 3101 - 3120 of 3,287
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 May 2008, 7:37 am
" asked Shedd, who is hearing the case along with Judges William B. [read post]
6 May 2008, 4:30 am
See, e.g., In re Dial-A-Mattress Operating Corp., 57 USPQ2d 1507 (Fed. [read post]
1 May 2008, 11:21 am
April 30, 2008).We like City of New York because the court rejects the same sort of arguments against the firearms statute that that we've seen raised against tort reform statutes generally - and also because of the court's treatment of the public nuisance issue.The first anti-tort reform argument is that "civil litigation. . .is not commercial in nature," and thus not reachable by Congress' Commerce Clause authority. [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 1:18 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKContracts Poet Wins Judgment on Fraud Claim Arising From Disputes Over Her Words on Greeting Cards B. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 7:24 pm
Another: Some other state constitutions make the members of the judiciary elective, and they are even subjected to frequent re-elections. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 6:08 pm
April 4, 2008 On December 1, 2007, some significant changes to the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure took effect. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 11:00 am
: Art, access and the public domain after Bridgeman v Corel’ – 29 April, New York City: (creativecommons.org), (Public Knowledge) US: ACI ‘Paragraph IV disputes’ conference – 30 April – 1 May, New York City: (Orange Book Blog) Pharma & Biotech Pharma & Biotech - General Canada: Patented Medicine Prices Review Board (PMPRB) departs from its guidelines in determining price in recent decision:… [read post]
25 Apr 2008, 1:46 am
In Oregon, at least on Trimet, speak softly and carry a big message.The case referred to in the Thursday, April 24, 2008, Oregonian story by John Snell:"TriMet: You shout, you're out: New rules - It's not what you say, but how loudly you say it, that will get you booted off the public transit system," can be found at the Oregon Judicial Department (OJD) Opinions webpage.The case is: STATE OF OREGON v. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 5:00 am
" See In re Remacle, 66 USPQ2d 1222 (TTAB 2002).Nonetheless, the Board found that the PTO had not met its "heavy burden. [read post]