Search for: "Jones v State" Results 3101 - 3120 of 6,138
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Sep 2019, 9:30 pm by ernst
Jones, Johns Hopkins University, delivered the Gilder-Jordan Lecture at the University of Mississippi on September 17. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 3:57 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  Now, we have Estate of Saul Schneider v Finmann 2010 NY Slip Op 05281 ;Decided on June 17, 2010 ;Court of Appeals ;Jones, J. [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 4:33 am
Employer’s failure to provide disciplinary hearing to a temporary employee after having initiated disciplinary action an abuse of discretionMatter of Kaefer v New York State Off. of Parks Recreation & Historical Preserv., 2010 NY Slip Op 51503(U), Decided on July 16, 2010, Supreme Court, Nassau County, Judge Ute Wolff Lally, [Not selected for publication in the Official Reports]Robert Kaefer had been employed as a “seasonal temporary” lifeguard for 18 years*… [read post]
24 Jan 2008, 8:02 am
The SEC’s stated goals in instituting this proposal were to minimize instances of fraud perpetrated by hedge funds. [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 1:13 pm by Joseph Jones
Skelton to have been acting “in the course of employment”, adopting a broad interpretation of the scope of employment (consistent with past case law: Bazely v Curry [1999 174 D.L.R. 4th 45], Lister [2001 UKHL 22] and Mohamud [2016 UKSC 11]). [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 2:53 am by Francis Davey
Prima facie, the costs which the applicant will be required to pay to the lessor as a term of obtaining relief will be assessed on an indemnity basis; if it were otherwise the lessor would not obtain the indemnity against proper expenses to which he is entitled - see Egerton v Jones [1939] 2 KB 702, 710. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 2:53 am by Francis Davey
Prima facie, the costs which the applicant will be required to pay to the lessor as a term of obtaining relief will be assessed on an indemnity basis; if it were otherwise the lessor would not obtain the indemnity against proper expenses to which he is entitled - see Egerton v Jones [1939] 2 KB 702, 710. [read post]
20 Feb 2007, 12:24 pm
  (A decision like unto last week's ruling by the Utah Supreme Court in Jones v. [read post]