Search for: "Judge v. United States"
Results 3101 - 3120
of 35,336
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 May 2012, 8:06 am
Here is the abstract: We were asked to write about one of the worst United States Supreme Court opinions we had read. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 10:22 am
Chicago’s Equity leases some 31 apartment complexes in the Bay State with about 6,680 units. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 2:38 pm
United States v. [read post]
30 Apr 2005, 11:07 am
At issue, then, is the continued vitality of the Supreme Court's decision in United States v. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 2:30 pm
On April 3, the CAFC held that the United States District Court for the Northern District of California (the district court) erred in refusing to remand a case to California state court where removal to a district court was improper under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
2 May 2016, 6:17 am
The post Acorda Therapeutics v. [read post]
27 Jan 2008, 8:53 pm
But not, an EDNY court ruled in United States v. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:24 pm
In United States v. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 6:00 am
The panel consisted of United States District Court Judge J. [read post]
5 May 2005, 3:29 pm
From the 7th Circuit we get United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 2:05 pm
On March 21, 2017, Judge George Daniels of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York partially granted and partially denied defendant’s motion to dismiss in Commerzbank AG v. [read post]
7 Mar 2007, 1:27 am
United States, 355 B.R. 758 (D. [read post]
8 May 2020, 1:05 pm
Ruling on a Rule 48(a) motion in 2019 in United States v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 2:25 pm
CAAF has released its opinion in United States v. [read post]
22 Jul 2012, 10:00 am
This week at the ACCA: The Army CCA will hear oral argument in United States v. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 7:50 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled that the district judge handling the case was required to examine the facts and decide “whether the interests of justice required substitution of counsel” when the inmate, Kenneth Clair, complained that his lawyer was not pursuing important evidence in his federal habeas corpus appeal. [read post]
27 Oct 2013, 4:37 pm
This principle most often arises in church property disputes, where the Supreme Court has held that courts may not decide which faction in a church is the more religiously orthodox, but it also applies more broadly to prohibit the government from adjudicating people’s rights based on theological judgments (see, e.g., United States v. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 12:58 pm
My starting disposition is to really not want parents to "kidnap" their kids from other countries and bring them back to the United States. [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 10:59 am
Today, Judge Leon presides over yet another ground-breaking case with similar themes: United States v. [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 10:59 am
Today, Judge Leon presides over yet another ground-breaking case with similar themes: United States v. [read post]
