Search for: "Label v Label" Results 3101 - 3120 of 13,303
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Dec 2018, 8:24 pm by Dean Freeman
Additional Resources: The Other Holiday Shopping: Grocery Shopping, Dec. 1, 2014, USDA More Blog Entries: Suarez v. [read post]
14 Dec 2018, 1:16 pm by Rebecca Yergin
In reaching this conclusion, the Commission’s Opinion initially decided that 1-800 Contacts’ settlements were not immune from antitrust review under FTC v. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 12:22 pm by Sanford Hausler
  It held that the plaintiffs had alleged a plausible claim and that the district's dismissal had been improper.The decision in Mantikas v. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 4:55 am
- Asolo v Red Bull | Questioning the trade mark judgesNever Too Late 203 [Weeks ending 14 and 21 Oct] Does FEYONCÉ blur BEYONCÉ's distinctiveness? [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 12:52 am
This change was made at the express suggestion of the registrar (Cadbury's application had been to amend the description to "the mark consists of the colour purple as shown applied to the packaging or labelling of goods covered by the registration".The reason for this application to change the mark was the impact of the decision in Société des Produits Nestlé SA v Cadbury UK Limited [2013] EWCA Civ 1174 ("Cadbury 1")… [read post]
7 Dec 2018, 2:45 am by Peter Groves
Cadbury UK Ltd v The Comptroller General of Patents Designs And Trade Marks [2018] EWCA Civ 2715 (05 December 2018) is an unedifying case. [read post]
2 Dec 2018, 7:49 am by Joel R. Brandes
 Findings and conclusions shall be in a separate paper from the judgment, which papers shall be labelled ”FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW” and ”JUDGMENT,” respectively. [read post]
2 Dec 2018, 7:49 am by Joel R. Brandes
 Findings and conclusions shall be in a separate paper from the judgment, which papers shall be labelled ”FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW” and ”JUDGMENT,” respectively. [read post]